I meant they were going full retard in general. This Capitol building thing just added to that statement.
Guys, they are just blocking weapons from entering the capitol building. They
weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition…
Then I am amused, bemused and confused why you are so strident in your criticism.
Would you criticize Australian legislators who violated the Australian constitution, if you had one?
Guys, they are just blocking weapons from entering the capitol building. They
weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition…
An even more egregious violation.
westaussie:As a matter of interest were there any restrictions with respect to guns at NRA conferences?
Yes. The NRA prohibits firearms at their conventions
No they don’t. They choose to respect whatever venue the conference is being held at.
westaussie:As a matter of interest were there any restrictions with respect to guns at NRA conferences?
Yes. The NRA prohibits firearms at their conventions
That’s not true.
In Michigan, our Supreme Court has already ruled that local municipalities can block weapons from entering their grounds (i.e. gun free schools).
In Michigan, our Supreme Court has already ruled that local municipalities can block weapons from entering their grounds (i.e. gun free schools).
Schools are a federal law. Public facilities are where the Constitution applies more, not less.
More fake news.
Because that is not the whole truth.
Some on the venues that the NRA uses for their conventions prohibit firearms. And of course the Secret service prohibit firearms while the President is there.
At all other times you can open and concealed carry at all NRA events as long as you abide by the state laws where the convention is being held and federal laws.
highroller:Guys, they are just blocking weapons from entering the capitol building. They
weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition…An even more egregious violation.
Try bringing a gun into the US capitol building.
That is a fairy tale told by the left. Maybe you need to do a little goggling an find out the whole truth so you don’t spread fake news.
Mountain_Soldier: westaussie:As a matter of interest were there any restrictions with respect to guns at NRA conferences?
Democrats want to legislate the NRA HQ range out of existence. You ok with narrow legislation that only targets them?
He was asking what the NRA’s own policy was…which is to not allow firearms at its conferences.
Is that an NRA policy or the policy of the venue?
WuWei: highroller:Guys, they are just blocking weapons from entering the capitol building. They
weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition…An even more egregious violation.
Try bringing a gun into the US capitol building.
My point exactly.
FloridaYankee: WuWei: highroller:Guys, they are just blocking weapons from entering the capitol building. They
weren’t expecting the Spanish Inquisition…An even more egregious violation.
Try bringing a gun into the US capitol building.
My point exactly.
I don’t think it’s egregious at all. Same with court houses. The risk of disaster is too high and it is not unconstitutional.
I don’t think it’s egregious at all. Same with court houses. The risk of disaster is too high and it is not unconstitutional.
It is most definitely unConstitutional.
FloridaYankee:I don’t think it’s egregious at all. Same with court houses. The risk of disaster is too high and it is not unconstitutional.
It is most definitely unConstitutional.
Pretty sure scotus has ruled differently
WuWei: FloridaYankee:I don’t think it’s egregious at all. Same with court houses. The risk of disaster is too high and it is not unconstitutional.
It is most definitely unConstitutional.
Pretty sure scotus has ruled differently
The SCOTUS is quite frequently wrong.
FloridaYankee: WuWei: FloridaYankee:I don’t think it’s egregious at all. Same with court houses. The risk of disaster is too high and it is not unconstitutional.
It is most definitely unConstitutional.
Pretty sure scotus has ruled differently
The SCOTUS is quite frequently wrong.
Sometimes yes.
The justices specifically said the government can ban firearms for felons or the mentally ill; it can ban guns in sensitive places, like schools and government buildings; and it can impose conditions and qualifications for the commercial sale of guns.
The justices specifically said the government can ban firearms for felons or the mentally ill;
Rights can be removed through due process after the fact.
it can ban guns in sensitive places, like schools and government buildings;
UnConstitutional. A clear and blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment.
and it can impose conditions and qualifications for the commercial sale of guns.
Again unConstitutional and an abuse of the Commerce Clause.
FloridaYankee:The justices specifically said the government can ban firearms for felons or the mentally ill;
Rights can be removed through due process after the fact.
FloridaYankee:it can ban guns in sensitive places, like schools and government buildings;
UnConstitutional. A clear and blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment.
FloridaYankee:and it can impose conditions and qualifications for the commercial sale of guns.
Again unConstitutional and an abuse of the Commerce Clause.
Well, that’s how they ruled. I agree with them for the most part.