The stupid ideas are just oozing from this thread.
Mount Rushmore is a glorious piece of our American experience. A tribute to accomplishment and ingenuity…and like everything right now a group of dimbasses who’s only accomplishments in life involve destroying things want to tear it down?
so if someone where to take your land,and build a great piece of art on it they should be entitled to keep it? what the difference. the tribes have been fighting for the land since before the monument was built
the land should be returned to the sioux and let them decide what to do with the monument
Dude…you actually argued that funding for the maintenance of one of the most beautiful monuments to the greatness of this country be ended and that monument be allowed to fall apart…
I pointed out what I believe to be the pure foolishness of that position…
And you have the nerve to offer snark about my
“mature, thoughtful and well reasoned” comment.
If Byrd’s name being on things in West Virgina is seen as a monument to hatred and oppression by marginalized communities there then it absolutely should be removed.
No one will ever make statues of, sing songs about, or pay tribute to these insane leftists. Nobody respects petty vandals that never did anything meaningful for this nation.
why not let the people on whose land it sits have a say? theres no dispute the land was stolen. its not on privately owned land so there is nothing preventing the government returning the land to its rightful owners