Shooting in Kenosha WI by citizen possible militia related

[SixFoot]

My second favorite Robert Duvall movie, next to Second Hand Lions.

[WuWei]

@SixFoot

My second favorite Robert Duvall movie, next to Second Hand Lions.

Who are you?

[SixFoot]

@WuWei

@SixFoot

My second favorite Robert Duvall movie, next to Second Hand Lions.

Who are you?

Grumpy, living out in the sticks. lol

[WuWei]

Back on topic, we have movement

Wisconsin Department of Justice: Blake admits he had a knife

Blake admitted he had a knife and agents recovered a knife from the driver’s side floorboard of Blake’s car according to a new press release from the Wisconsin DOJ: [image] [image] Joe Biden has already declared that the officers used excessive force and systemic racism was to blame. . . .yet another Black American is a victim of excessive force. Is Biden liable for defamation if evidence shows the force was not excessive given the threat to the lives of the police? Does Biden have any …

[SixFoot]

@WuWei

Back on topic, we have movement

Wisconsin Department of Justice: Blake admits he had a knife

Uh oh, that pesky narrative again.

[bigtwnvin]

@WuWei

The gangbanger who was shot in the chest and killed.

You mean the dumb arse that voluntarily put himself in a volatile situation with people totin’ firearms.
Darwin Award finalist.

[Konssurvative1]

What was he hunting Richard Connell?

[Oldandtired]

Nope that is for anyone under 14.
Minors 14-17 may possess a firearm without an adult present. If they have passed a hunter safety course.
Says nothing about hunting.

[Oldandtired]

Could have taken one in his own home state.

[WuWei]

@Oldandtired

Could have taken one in his own home state.

Would it be valid in Wisconsin?

[WCD9973]

@Oldandtired

You need to quit saying he was in illegal possession of a rifle. If he had attended and passed a hunter safety course according to WI law he was not in illegal possession of a rifle. Now put up your proof he had not passed a hunter safety course.

Dude. 3rd time. If he passed a course it’s legal ONLY when in a area where hunting is allowed or when traveling to and from that area and when the firearm is unloaded and in a case.

Otherwise, he is in illegal possession.

[WuWei]

@SixFoot

@WuWei

Back on topic, we have movement

Wisconsin Department of Justice: Blake admits he had a knife

Uh oh, that pesky narrative again.

Curiouser and curiouser

[SixFoot]

It’s all starting to look intentional at this point.

[WuWei]

@SixFoot

It’s all starting to look intentional at this point.

Hanlon’s Razor

[Oldandtired]

Works that way in my state. Neighboring states and my state work together. Also the laws are about the same.

[Bosun]

Glad you could lend some reality to this SneakySFDude. Some are caught in emotionalism and mob rule. Good job, Bro.

[Oldandtired]

It helps if you spend the time to read your own link. The proof you provided does not say anything about anyone over the age of 14.

[WCD9973]

Send the link.
That is not anywhere in the statue

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/55#:~:text=948.60%20Possession%20of%20a%20dangerous%20weapon%20by%20a%20person%20under%2018.&text=(a)%20Any%20person%20under%2018,Except%20as%20provided%20in%20par.

And the relevant passage
a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.

(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.

(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.

(3)

(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult’s supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult’s supervision.

(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.

(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.

Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).

[Oldandtired]

This is talking and handguns not rifles. The only thing a seventeen year can’t do is purchase a rifle or handgun. They can possess a rifle not a handgun.