Do you have proof that Hannity is accepting loans? Because you brought it up. And if so…so what.
So you know how hard it is to flip houses? Most people don’t make any money.
Not loans - loan guarantees from HUD:
The Georgia purchases were funded with mortgages for $17.9m that Hannity obtained with help from Hud, which insured the loans under a program created as part of the National Housing Act. The loans, first guaranteed under the Obama administration, were recently increased by $5m with renewed support from Carson’s department.
from:
So he’s using loan guarantees from the federal government.
And the ‘so what’ is two things:
-
Hannity rails against the federal government getting involved in things it shouldn’t. I don’t think the constitution mentions guaranteeing loans to millionaires who want to buy foreclosed properties. So it would be more honest of him to either acknowledge that some of these federal programs actually serve a purpose - a purpose he himself uses. Or to, while railing against these programs, admit to his audience that he uses one.
-
While Obama - who he mocks - started this program he presumably appreciates, it continues today, and he received an additional 5M in guarantees from Carson. He should have disclosed this while giving Carson a softball fluff interview so his listeners could decide if his glowing words were in appreciate of the guarantees.
I don’t think sean is flipping these. I think he is renting them. I could be wrong on that.
Warren has nothing to do with Hannity.
Quoted for the sheer delicious irony of it.
What was fake about the news?
JWK did you post the quote from Phyllis Schlafly? I find her to be incorrect in her reading of the US Constitution and a Convention of States. The sentence in question is long and cumbersome, but, if carefully read and analyzed in the grammar of the day, it does offer that a Convention of States may be called by the Legislatures of the States and offer Amendments and then confirm those Amendments.
Sean, is there any place on your site to discuss Real Estate investing? I would like to discuss a unique approach to Affordable Housing, if possible.
The only comment I’ll make is that no one was really making a fuss over this when Sean launched his social media defense.
All the Guardian story did was outline that Sean has made a lot of real estate investments…some with HUD loan guarantees backing up his investments.
And that’s ALL they said.
1 Like
Were any laws broken in either case? If not, then move on instead of babbling on and on about Hannity because you are jealous of his success.
JWK
The unavoidable truth is, our social democrat political leaders’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by confiscating the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
lol.
Another ‘conservative’ who doesn’t see the hypocrisy that Sean Hannity, who literally makes his living complaining about government programs and Obama used a government program started under Obama to enrich himself.
So funny.
And why has the Guardian not published a story outlining how the Clinton’s have used their political positions to rake in hundreds of millions of dollars? Even at the expense of transferring control over 20% of our uranium deposits to a Russian company.
Unlike the Clintons, Hannity did not hold a government office of public trust and use it to feather his family’s nest. Why does that not bother you or our Fifth Column Yellow Journalists? Eh?
JWK
Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism, Hollywood, and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary
You are missing the point.
Hannity didn’t do anything illegal, or even immoral. He is just hypocritical and disingenuous with his audience.
That’s all. It’s not that big of a deal really - it’s just really, really funny.
Unlike our Fifth Column Socialists, Hannity supports ending all those federal government free cheese programs. Do you support ending every federal “program” which is not authorized by the defined and limited powers granted to our federal government?
JWK
There was a time not too long ago in New York when able-bodied people were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now there is an infestation of ticks and fleas who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex and Lotto tickets.
Now you’re getting there…
See, it’s funny because Hannity screams about ending these programs, calls them all sorts of names, and calls the people that create them worse - THEN HE USES THEM!
See? Funny!
No, you are missing the point. How many millions upon millions of dollars has the federal government squeezed from Hannity? To suggest Hannity is a hypocrite because he tries to get some of his own money back from the federal government in a legal way is ludicrous and absurd to say the least.
I remember when our Fifth Column Socialists danced in the streets when Leona Helmsley was sentenced to jail for tax evasion. And yet, she paid more in federal taxes every freaken year than those who danced in the streets pay their entire lives.
The only hypocrites in this discussion are those who are jealous of others success.
JWK
Our Washington Sewer Rats will cling, with all their life, to the communist/socialist/progressive income tax which they use to confiscate, and then spread the wealth which is created by labor, business and investors.
To get some of his own money back. He would be very comfortable without such programs. Are you?
JWK
They are not “liberals”. They are conniving Fifth Column parasites who use the cloak of government force to steal and then enjoy the wealth which wage earners, business and investors have worked to create
the guardian didnt publish the story becasue they try to avoid publishing fake news…
So if you are rich enough to pay a lot in taxes, it’s ok for you to use government programs that let you buy investment properties? THAT is your position? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
What a crock.
So now you are accusing the New York Times of publishing fake news?
See: Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
"As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well?.
JWK
Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism, Hollywood, and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary
