I completely agree with this sentiment. And my opinion is that it is the latter of the two options you accurately provided.
So, itās a political persecution, not justiceā¦
Democrats are equally guilty of this, they controlled the DOJ for eight years, I didnāt see them arrest Bush or Cheney.
But then, Obama didnāt accuse them of being criminals and whine about the DOJ not going after them.
Are the charges not valid?
Plenty of Democrats did.
Sure, but Iām talking about the guy in charge.
The case against the President Trump is over. Itās time to move on. . . Mueller knows federal prosecutors cannot indict a sitting President, even if they had something on him, which they donāt.
Why didnāt you share your magical abilities sooner?
If you are talking to me, I did share it.
Political how? He was employed by the campaign. And even if his money laundering was done outside, that doesnāt eliminate the fact he may have done other illegals with the campaign.
How does it work? How are you able to enter the minds of all of the players and find out something that even Mueller might not know yet?
Youāre amazing.
What didnāt Mueller know?
Mueller now says he canāt indict Trump, but this law professor says others can.
Youāre asking me? You just said the investigation would turn up nothing. Just use your ESP and find out. And please share your findings.
1 Like
anonymous internet posters. the best way to judge potential crimes.
If they were going for obstruction or collusion, neither are crimes.
What else you got?
Obstruction of justice isnāt a crime?
In addition to mindreading, you can change federal criminal statutes, too?
I know who I am. 
