Arguing reality is pointless. Attempting to argue reality is equally frivolous.
Republicans used to be against frivolous lawsuits.
Seriously - these jokers have been bitching about tort reform for decades because of the cost of frivolous lawsuits.
These jabronis go 1 for 100 and itâs âWe need to let the legal process workâ
Well, when youâre wasting other peoplesâ money instead of your own, it just isnât as big of an issue.
I mean come on. Does anyone seriously think the âTrump campaignâ is spending their own money on this â â â â â â â â â â
I wonder how many of those suckers who have signed up for automatic contributions honestly thought their money would go towards this stuff?
Campaigning isnât cheap. Itâs even less cheap when you donât bother with campaigning and try to overturn an election via the courts instead.
Democrats used to be for them. See Gore in Florida.
Rudy went from being âAmericaâs Mayorâ to âAmericaâs disgrace.â
wiley8425:These cases were all tossed for a reason. More than a dozen claiming the same thing (with no evidence) would be frivolous in the real world.
Who is the plaintiff on the cases that got tossed?
Take a look at the transcript to the Georgia. The lawyers in that case admit that the trump campaign supplemented their costs. I think you will find this to be true of all cases that have been filed.
Rudy went from being âAmericaâs Mayorâ to âAmericaâs disgrace.â
Pretty sure you donât speak for America.
mobiusptc:Not when you doing it willingly. Like using numbers from Minnesota and saying they are the numbers from Michigan
I canât speak to that. The whole thing has been somewhat confusing to me and I donât really consider myself to be a dumb bunny.
What I do care about is if there is fraud, it gets exposed and it gets fixed. We, no matter the party, need to have confidence in our election process.
If it turns out there is nothing to it? Good. Does it need to be tweaked? If so, letâs improve it.
To say that discovering that there is or is not merit should lead to disbarment?
That should scare the daylights out of anyone.
I donât know of any complaint that claims âfraudâ. It is a claim with specific legal definitions. There was s a reason that fraud has not been claimed as a cause of action in these cases. The evidence is not there to claim it.
Well, when youâre wasting other peoplesâ money instead of your own, it just isnât as big of an issue.
I mean come on. Does anyone seriously think the âTrump campaignâ is spending their own money on this â â â â â â â â â â
I wonder how many of those suckers who have signed up for automatic contributions honestly thought their money would go towards this stuff?
Campaigning isnât cheap. Itâs even less cheap when you donât bother with campaigning and try to overturn an election via the courts instead.
I will never understand why Trump chose Guiliani.
mobiusptc:Whom do you think?
The Plaintiffs that didnât have the evidence. Who do you think?
Yet, do you think the Plaintiffs that had their cases thrown out are represented by Giuliani?
Why call for disbarment unless it is a means to silence.
This stance should concern anyone who has to be in a court of law at some point in their lifetime.
They are worried that the wide spread dem voter fraud will be seen for what it is in court.
The stolen election could get away from them.
Hence this unheard of dem is going after the presidents lawyers.
DMK: mobiusptc:Whom do you think?
The Plaintiffs that didnât have the evidence. Who do you think?
Yet, do you think the Plaintiffs that had their cases thrown out are represented by Giuliani?
Why call for disbarment unless it is a means to silence.
This stance should concern anyone who has to be in a court of law at some point in their lifetime.
They are worried that the wide spread dem voter fraud will be seen for what it is in court.
The stolen election could get away from them.
Hence this unheard of dem is going after the presidents lawyers.
What fraud? There hasnât been any indication of any fraud much less widespread. Where is your proof? Why is it not shown in court?
DMK: mobiusptc:Whom do you think?
The Plaintiffs that didnât have the evidence. Who do you think?
Yet, do you think the Plaintiffs that had their cases thrown out are represented by Giuliani?
Why call for disbarment unless it is a means to silence.
This stance should concern anyone who has to be in a court of law at some point in their lifetime.
They are worried that the wide spread dem voter fraud will be seen for what it is in court.
The stolen election could get away from them.
Hence this unheard of dem is going after the presidents lawyers.
Have you by any chance seen how these lawsuits have held up in court so far? I donât think Biden has anything to worry about there if their performance so far is any indication.
The judges who are tossing them are all deep state moles, apparently.
Heâs a disgrace and Iâm sure Iâm the only one who feels the same. There is NO proof of voter fraud. trump is losing his mind and has lost the election.
DEAL WITH IT.
LOL wowâŚsuch bitterness from someone that claims to have libertarian/Constitutional values.
Almost as bad as our âtrue conservativesâ that have never seen a lib cause or statement they disagree with.
gooddad409: DMK: mobiusptc:Whom do you think?
The Plaintiffs that didnât have the evidence. Who do you think?
Yet, do you think the Plaintiffs that had their cases thrown out are represented by Giuliani?
Why call for disbarment unless it is a means to silence.
This stance should concern anyone who has to be in a court of law at some point in their lifetime.
They are worried that the wide spread dem voter fraud will be seen for what it is in court.
The stolen election could get away from them.
Hence this unheard of dem is going after the presidents lawyers.
Have you by any chance seen how these lawsuits have held up in court so far? I donât think Biden has anything to worry about there if their performance so far is any indication.
I would suggest that anyone that wants to look into actions that could result in an attorney being disbarred or sanctioned to read Rule 11 of civil procedure.
LOL wowâŚsuch bitterness from someone that claims to have libertarian/Constitutional values.
If you had heard Giuliani in court youâd think differently.
Guy clearly has lost itâŚand his press conference was over the top whackjob.
Elect a clown, get a circus.