Most of them the trump lawyers have actively said they were not looking for fraud. Hell Rudy G himself said it at his last court appearance.
Anyone with ethics wouldn’t demand or file a frivolous lawsuit to disbar people doing their jobs.
2 Likes
That building is being held responsible for its actions.
4 Likes
So, they should be disbarred? Who is the Plaintiff and what are the issues they are presenting?
Minus the LOL. 
What Mr. Pascrell is calling for is frivolous and quite frankly repugnant.
But, he needs his 30 seconds of fame.
Never heard of the guy before this thread.
He isn’t as relevant as he’d like to be.
3 Likes
Because they are bring lawsuit they know they have no basis in wasting the court time. It’s no different then those patent trolls. One of the early one was about not having gop observer in count room. When pressed by the judge on his honor as an member of the court, the lawyer admitted there were indeed gop representative in the count room. What the point of that lawsuit?
It happened over and over and over for 30 times hence why they have such a horrible record. The only win they have so far is when the court agreed to reduce observes from 6ft away to 3 feet
Waste of time and bad faith on behalf of plaintiff.not even talking about the giant mistakes in paperwork and errors. Even a first year law student wouldn’t make
Who is they that is wasting the court time?
Whom do you think?
K. 
The Plaintiffs that didn’t have the evidence. Who do you think?
Yet, do you think the Plaintiffs that had their cases thrown out are represented by Giuliani?
Why call for disbarment unless it is a means to silence.
This stance should concern anyone who has to be in a court of law at some point in their lifetime.
2 Likes
Is Obamacare a tax or a penalty? I guess it just depends if you’re a lawyer or a subject. But that’s ok, just ignore it.
2 Likes
No he couldn’t have.
Let’s use an example, Stephen Miller is a young man. Where do you see his future? It doesn’t look all that bright to me. Who do you think will hire him?
I mean, look what they did to Sean Spicer
1 Like
It’s not that they are losing because they don’t have access to evidence or because they are looking for evidence. They are losing because they have no standing.
Should they have brought up a lawsuit claiming there are no observer KNOWING they were indeed multiple observers in the count room? Is that not litteraly a frivolous lawsuit?
No. It isn’t frivolous.
If every lawsuit falls on its face and it restores confidence do you consider that frivolous?
Should the people who worked to do that be silenced and disbarred?
They Knew 
that there were observers in the count room. What possible reason and goal where they trying to achieve when they knew there were GOP observers already there
That is frivolous. There is no other word for it.
Frivolous is in the eye of the beholder.
No. No it’s not
In the case of the Bill Pascrell? Yes. It is.
That isn’t how that works. Words mean things.
1 Like
No no it’s not.
