This thread is the perfect example of people falling for the ■■■■■■■■ they read on the internet and social media and why it needs to be combatted. VAERS are unconfirmed reports.
VAERS accepts reports from anyone. Patients, parents, caregivers and healthcare providers (HCP) are encouraged to report adverse events after vaccination to VAERS even if it is not clear that the vaccine caused the adverse event. In addition, HCP are required to report certain adverse events after vaccination.
One of the main limitations of VAERS data is that it cannot determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse event. This limitation has caused confusion in the publicly available data from VAERS WONDER, specifically regarding the number of reported deaths. There have been instances where people have misinterpreted reports of deaths following vaccination as deaths caused by the vaccines; that is not accurate. VAERS accepts all reports of adverse health events following vaccinations without judging whether the vaccine caused the adverse health event. Some reports to VAERS represent true vaccine reactions and others are coincidental adverse health events and not related to vaccination. Overall, a causal relationship cannot be established using information from VAERS report alone.
Who says that all VAERS reports are required to be investigated? Whatever the case, even if none have been investigated there is still no evidence for the OP’s claim.
This probably comes as a shock to some of our lib friends who have been telling us the vaccines are perfectly safe and some have even claimed zero deaths from the vaccine.
Most of those guys haven’t weighed in yet. Waiting on talking pts?