Then you are ignoring reality and creating a situation where people will buy harmful products.
It used to just be actual marijuana flower, which is easy enough for someone to inspect, but with vaping being common, it is far more dangerous.
Then you are ignoring reality and creating a situation where people will buy harmful products.
It used to just be actual marijuana flower, which is easy enough for someone to inspect, but with vaping being common, it is far more dangerous.
Translation-you’re OK with big government nanny state telling us what’s good for us and deciding what’s best for society.
You are cherry picking as well, that’s the point. Correlation is fun. Seems you are the one forgetting “8th grade science”.
when you ask this poster to cite some conservatives who believe this, come on back
; )
Funny that conservatives think criminals follow DUI laws.
Camp:
I just don’t find lending legal validation to a mind altering substance as seemingly mild as pot is good cultural stewardship.
Translation-you’re OK with big government nanny state telling us what’s good for us and deciding what’s best for society.
more arm chair libertarianism.
You are cherry picking as well, that’s the point. Correlation is fun. Seems you are the one forgetting “8th grade science”.
not so. i cited studies that shows pot affects hand-eye, more statistically related to fatal accidents…
that’s support for my case
sorry
when you ask this poster to cite some conservatives who believe this, come on back
; )
ImRightYoureWrong:
Cite ANYONE who believes it.
But I get it. You can’t, so you’re going to spend the next 100 posts refusing to back up a claim you made.
Now, carry on with the next distraction refusal to answer.
thinkingman:
when you ask this poster to cite some conservatives who believe this, come on back
; )
ImRightYoureWrong:
Cite ANYONE who believes it.
But I get it. You can’t, so you’re going to spend the next 100 posts refusing to back up a claim you made.
Now, carry on with the next distraction refusal to answer.
it is your prerogative to disagree with it
but until you prove it wrong, shutters flapping
What does the data in Colorado show about fatal accidents, since that’s the new criteria?
Better translation. I don’t want to share sidewalks and buses with people who are confident in their mind altered state because it is legal and proper.
I didn’t disagree with it. I agree that it impairs.
You claimed there are pothead lefties who believe it. Cite any pothead lefty (aka “libertarian”) who believes it.
What does the data in Colorado show about fatal accidents, since that’s the new criteria?
running back to that now i see, while ignoring all the other studies about pot effects on body, and accident statistics.
try and shape your lil narrative…
Best translation-you’re OK with big nanny government policing behavior and deciding how society and culture should be.
I didn’t disagree with it. I agree that it impairs.
You claimed there are pothead lefties who believe it. Cite any pothead lefty (aka “libertarian”) who believes it.
why should i cite them?
running back to that now i see
Running back to post 138 from 5m ago where you said:
more statistically related to fatal accidents
So, what’s the latest data for fatal accidents in CO, since you just mentioned them as relevant?
why should i cite them?
I mean, I’ve asked nicely, a bunch of times.
But I get why you don’t want to answer. It’s OK. You don’t need back your assertion. We get how this works.
it is your prerogative to disagree with it
but until you prove it wrong, shutters flapping
You haven’t proven it right. You made a claim, but you refuse to back it
No-I’m simply calling out those who pretend to dislike big government nanny state for their love of big government nanny state.
Better translation. I don’t want to share sidewalks and buses with people who are confident in their mind altered state because it is legal and proper.
why not? What possible harm does someone high present in those scenarios that a sober person does not?
The “high” from Marijuana lasts (lasts on average 1-4 hrs), THC can be detected in the blood stream anywhere from 2-7 days after use.