Im guessing from from his refusal to answer that they are lower and blow away the argument he was desperately trying to make
1 Like
already posted that article and discussed. please feel free to re-read
no. they line up with the other stuff in thread i posted that you will surely dare not acknowledge.
Have you ever smoked marijuana?
I did, care to link to a post?
1 Like
I think the irony of my post went over your head
Then why did traffic accidents then decrease after the initial studies?
1 Like
Your study on the effects does nothing to establish that people were breaking the law and driving under the influence.
Back to 8th grade science!
He watched Reefer Madness, what else do you need? Devil grass!
1 Like
You posted about fatal auto accidents in Colorado? I’m having trouble spotting the post. Could you graciously offer the post # please? Thanks!
They might smile at you. Maybe engage you in friendly banter? Or just ignore you and carry on? The horror.
So let’s summarize. Your theory is that law abiding people who did not smoke pot because it was illegal, suddenly became criminals and broke the law by driving under the influence when pot became legal.
Yeah, doesn’t even pass the sniff test. Sorry.
Restaurants, bars, and parties (well just about any public place with adults) must be a nightmare for you!
So we’ll put you in the “Restore Prohibition” camp. Good to know.
1 Like
You have it backwards. THC leaves the bloodstream before someone is completely unimpaired (If they do not smoke habitually). As for chronic users, that’s where the testing would need to be quantitative and not just qualitative, as both THC and it’s metabolites are constantly being released at low levels from fat stores.
Also, it appears saliva may be the best method and is under development. That combined with field testing is probably the solution.
Put me in the relaxed criminal misdemeanor and OK for medical pain use box.
I don’t want preteens and teens and young adults getting the impression that “high” is OK.
Why not? We teach them that drunk is ok as long as they’re over 21. Why can’t “high” be as “ok” as “drunk” is “ok”?
2 Likes
You’re ignoring all the posts he didnt make!
1 Like
i cant acknowledge what you havent posted
1 Like
No you didn’t. Studies show fatal accidents didn’t increase more than expected / normal. The study you linked were accidents generally. A study came out right around the same time as the one you linked to not showing an increase in fatal accidents
1 Like
