People are killing, maiming, and stealing regardless.
And when caught they should go to jail. People shouldn’t be jailed for buying and consuming THC.
They should if driving impaired.
I agree
how about all that stuff that indicates driving under influence of pot is not a good idea?
pretty crazy huh?
i cited no libertarians in that post
When has someone indicated otherwise?
So since these states are still smoking weed and traffic accidents have now DECREASED, then obviously weed makes people drive safer, right?
Correlation is fun.
1 Like
No one wants to drive with anyone who is impaired by any drug or alcohol, or texting, or whatever distracting or mind altering substance.
Do you have an actual point?
I think I’ll spend my birthday fully medicated from now until bedtime. Promise not to drive anywhere. Y’all have fun arguing sober. lol
1 Like
That’s the 64,000 dollar question. there is no standard rate for metabolizing THC, as a result there is no standardized test for detecting whether someone is impaired or not.
1 Like
No, it’s a terrible idea. Nothing crazy about it.
You claimed there were people who believed driving while high does not impair a person.
So who are the Libertarians you cited who believed that smoking weed does not impair your driving?
You are correct!!
Thanks!
Vaping illness is due to black market products, and essentially any random person buying and filling cartridges (that are counterfeit) with synthetic weed and/or cutting it with weird additives. Vitamin E acetate is the current suspected compound that may have started this.
Legalization and regulation is the best solution.
1 Like
I believe this is the 5th or 6th time this question has been asked, and it will not be answered. It was an asinine claim made hoping we would gloss over it, and now that the query is being posed, it is being actively ignored and dodged. And that’s expected.
1 Like
You stated the following:
I guess you’re now going to say you didn’t mean libertarians when you said “libertarians.”
So since you’re just going to parse, I’ll rephrase:
Who are the pothead lefties who don’t think their driving is impaired while high? Cite them please.
1 Like
Blood test for THC works just fine. Testing cannabinoids is the problem, and specifically in urine. The latter fuels a whole testing industry IMO.
I am not in favor of recreational use.
I am fine with medicinal use even if it is for a sore posterior.
Decriminalizing is also OK.
I just don’t find lending legal validation to a mind altering substance as seemingly mild as pot is good cultural stewardship.
lol. read through the thread
when you cherry pick what you look at yes, it can be. because it feeds your narrative
