Read the opinion: Federal judge dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania

My friend Matt burned Giuliani and Trump down to the ground.

He starts his opinion off thusly as he dismisses Trump’s Pennsylvania complaint with prejudice.

I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, the Trump Campaign and the Individual Plaintiffs
(collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) seek to discard millions of votes legally cast by
Pennsylvanians from all corners – from Greene County to Pike County, and
everywhere in between. In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise
almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which
a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms
of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when
seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with
compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief
despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.

That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative
complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this
cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its
sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At
bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss
Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.

7 Likes

Is this 2-34 for Trump and his allies? I can’t keep track of all the losing.

1 Like

That’s about right. Might be 33. And the 2 so called wins were inconsequential BS.

Is this the one Sean Parnell signed on to? I saw an article but didn’t have time to do anything skim it.

This :fire::fire::fire::fire:

1 Like

Judge Brann appointed by Barack Obama. 2012

What’s your point?

Covid threw all the rules out.

Time to let Biden steer the ship.

Trump is just wasting his efforts now.

if you read between the lines you can clearly see that he is saying all biden votes will be thrown out and trump wins PA in a LANDSLIDE!!!111!!!..

Good thread.

Called it.

:+1: :clown_face: :face_vomiting:

2 Likes

not at all… the more trump loses the angrier his followers get…

i fully support trump keep fighting… burn the gop to the ground!

5 Likes

At the recommendation of Senator Toomey. I have known Matt since childhood. He is judicially to the right of everyone on the Supreme Court except Barrett and Thomas.

:rofl:

8 Likes

It doesn’t matter. They were expecting to have to appeal. It will end up in the Supreme Court.

Pennsylvania couldn’t count their mail votes until AFTER “in person” votes were counted. Trump is a sore loser. He lost; plain & simple.

This is how he got through life: suing people to get his way.

2 Likes

Trump doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

No it won’t. Words mean things.

“In the formal legal world, a court case that is dismissed with prejudice means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can’t be brought back to court.

Suckers and Losers. Womp womp.

2 Likes

It can’t, was dismissed with prejudice. Can’t Be appealed.

1 Like

it can be appealed. it cant be refiled but you can always appeal to a higher court

The Supreme Court will not throw out millions of votes and hand Pennsylvania to Trump.

They may not even hear this case.

Especially not now since Trump’s legal team messed them up already by suggesting the Trump appointees to the Court were beholden to him.

The Stupid Coup is coming to and end.

How long that end is only Trump knows.