No you don’t. The proper process for asylum is to come through a border station and apply there. Wading across the Rio Grande is not the legal way to do it.
PurpnGold:
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
If the border was secure, there would be no encounters.
Uh what?
You heard me.
It’s not rocket science. If they never come across the border, ICE will never encounter them.
You have to be IN THE US to claim asylum at the border
. That is an “encounter”
No you don’t. The proper process for asylum is to come through a border station and apply there. Wading across the Rio Grande is not the legal way to do it.
And the border station is located where? In the US or Mexico?
And can you quote the law that requires someone claim asylum at a border station?
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
If the border was secure, there would be no encounters.
Uh what?
You heard me.
It’s not rocket science. If they never come across the border, ICE will never encounter them.
You have to be IN THE US to claim asylum at the border
. That is an “encounter”
No you don’t. The proper process for asylum is to come through a border station and apply there. Wading across the Rio Grande is not the legal way to do it.
And the border station is located where? In the US or Mexico?
And can you quote the law that requires someone claim asylum at a border station?
There are 50 official border crossings on the Mexican border. They are manned by both US and Mexican officials. Haven’t you ever gone from California to Mexico in a car or on foot?
The effort FAR FAR exceeds my expectations.
Very happy.
Judges are breaking the law to hamper the will of the vote. Bad place to be.
PurpnGold:
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
If the border was secure, there would be no encounters.
Uh what?
You heard me.
It’s not rocket science. If they never come across the border, ICE will never encounter them.
You have to be IN THE US to claim asylum at the border
. That is an “encounter”
No you don’t. The proper process for asylum is to come through a border station and apply there. Wading across the Rio Grande is not the legal way to do it.
And the border station is located where? In the US or Mexico?
And can you quote the law that requires someone claim asylum at a border station?
There are 50 official border crossings on the Mexican border. They are manned by both US and Mexican officials. Haven’t you ever gone from California to Mexico in a car or on foot?
What is the law that requires someone declare asylum at a border cross station?
It’s pretty straightforward logic. The law says that it’s illegal to enter the country except at official ports of entry and also that one seeking asylum must be in the country to apply. Putting those two together and you get: Come into the country legally through a border immigration station (into the sterile zone controlled by the agents on our side of the border) and ask for asylum.
Biden deports 500 illegals: He ain’t doing ■■■■ !
Trump deports 500 illegals: Look at him go! The man is a nonstop whirlwind of action! I wanna have your baby!!!
Biden attracts thousands in caravans and deports a few.
Trump discourages caravans and deports more.
The effort FAR FAR exceeds my expectations.
Very happy.
Judges are breaking the law to hamper the will of the vote. Bad place to be.
We need to build more detention centers. People are less likely to want to stay in a detention center waiting for their fake asylum claims to be rejected than they are to wait around in a sanctuary state enjoying benefits.
It’s pretty straightforward logic. The law says that it’s illegal to enter the country except at official ports of entry and also that one seeking asylum must be in the country to apply. Putting those two together and you get: Come into the country legally through a border immigration station (into the sterile zone controlled by the agents on our side of the border) and ask for asylum.
I’m waiting…
Biden deports 500 illegals: He ain’t doing ■■■■ !
Trump deports 500 illegals: Look at him go! The man is a nonstop whirlwind of action! I wanna have your baby!!!
The atmosphere in your world must be around 10 - 12 % oxygen. ![]()
Samm:
It’s pretty straightforward logic. The law says that it’s illegal to enter the country except at official ports of entry and also that one seeking asylum must be in the country to apply. Putting those two together and you get: Come into the country legally through a border immigration station (into the sterile zone controlled by the agents on our side of the border) and ask for asylum.
I’m waiting…
For what? I answered your question. Are you having difficulty understanding it?
We need to build more detention centers. People are less likely to want to stay in a detention center waiting for their fake asylum claims to be rejected than they are to wait around in a sanctuary state enjoying benefits.
NYC is spending $4billion a year on illegals. Chicago, half a billion. Denver, almost 400 million (which is almost 10% of the city’s budget!)
Forget detention centers. Just toss them back over the wall. (Once we build the wall, of course.)
PurpnGold:
Samm:
It’s pretty straightforward logic. The law says that it’s illegal to enter the country except at official ports of entry and also that one seeking asylum must be in the country to apply. Putting those two together and you get: Come into the country legally through a border immigration station (into the sterile zone controlled by the agents on our side of the border) and ask for asylum.
I’m waiting…
For what? I answered your question. Are you having difficulty understanding it?
Cite
The
Law
Samm:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
It’s pretty straightforward logic. The law says that it’s illegal to enter the country except at official ports of entry and also that one seeking asylum must be in the country to apply. Putting those two together and you get: Come into the country legally through a border immigration station (into the sterile zone controlled by the agents on our side of the border) and ask for asylum.
I’m waiting…
For what? I answered your question. Are you having difficulty understanding it?
Cite
The
Law
Immigration law. Who cares what the statute number is.
-
Legal entry is only possible through ports of entry.
-
An immigrant must be in the country to request asylum.
-
Therefore, to be here legally to request asylum, one must come into the country through an official port of entry.
The fact that asylum requests by many people who come here illegally are processed and that many of them are granted, means the law requiring entry at official border ports to be legal simply means the law has been ignored. Thank you Brandon.
peek-a-boo:
PurpnGold:
Biden allowed an exponential increase in asylum claims. But that doesn’t mean the border wasn’t secure. It’s possible the vetting was piss poor… if it was… I’d say that isn’t secure.
What does encounters mean in the context of the border?
Spin it anyway you like, but the border was never secure under Biden.
Guess it comes down to how you define “secure”.
What do encounters mean?
You mean… ![]()
It depends on what the word " IT " means?
Yeah! More detention centers. Where we could concentrate these undesirables until we can process them for a final solution.
It would create a lot of jobs too!
Word salads begin with screwing around with the language.
The NAZI analogies are not working. Their issue was not removing people trying to break in illegally into the third Reich. Give it up. It’s so third grade.
Running around calling everyone you disagree with “fascists” is so antifa.
The NAZI analogies are not working. Their issue was not removing people trying to break in illegally into the third Reich. Give it up. It’s so third grade.
Fascism is fascism.
You probably don’t know this, but the NAZIs stripped Jews and others of their German citizenship and declared them enemies of the state.
Of course there are other cases.
The parallels are always almost the same.