You mean the one where the therapist supposedly misunderstood, or got the notes wrong? Notes released to a newspaper she told the therapist there were 4 in the room with her.
Really when you plan on remaining anonymous you scrub your social media?
I wasn’t allegedly assaulted.
Now if you go back a few years to '79, July of that year. I was thinking “damn rock, why did you have to be in the road!”
What other investigation? An unknown house? And unknown date? Unknown who else was in the house or where they might be? Investigate how much each party had to drink (so far in the thing I read she has admitted to a beer while the other two had consumed “far more”. Well after the one beer did she have more? How long after the “beer” did this occure. You know they have to investigate HER story as well right? Could the “beer” be why she can’t remember how she got to the party or got home?
Makes sense to have taken that precaution, don’t you think?
You know what scrubbed means right? Means it’s still there, but all the information that could be used against her/makes her look bad has been removed.
So she couldn’t trust the people she told to keep her anonymous? But yea it makes sense, she knew she would be outed some how.
Never said she was a saint. Said the story should be thoroughly investigated.
Then investigate it.
If the dems wanted her story investigated why didn’t they ask for the investigation in July? Dems want to claim reps don’t want her story to be told but the dems have done nothing for months to get her story investigated so I don’t see where they really cared about her story
And dems should say all they care about is payback for garland because they certainly don’t care about a story they sat on for months.
Read back through the thread. It’s been said why several times.
Apparently tonight Lindsey Graham is stating if she doesn’t show up on Monday they are going to call for a vote on Wednesday.
Time will tell.
I’ve read the whole thing and it is clear why the dems sat on this for months. Dems want to delay the vote until after the election for payback for garland so they hold her story for months then release it and demand an investigation before a vote that would push it until after the election.
If they wanted a real investiaion they call for it in july. Not now.
Where are you seeing this? And it makes sense that she would scrub everything which would include links to people that posted on her page.
As it turns out, she was right.
Honestly what did she expect? She gave a major dem senator evidence that could help derail a supreme court nomineee but didnt’ want to ever be identified or have to testify. Did you really think she could derail the nominee without having to come forward publically? You can’t put alligations like that out there without people (politicians and media investigating).
So how did she think she could drop a bombshell like that and remain anonymous?
Before coming forward with the allegations, Blasey scrubbed most of her social media profile.
Wow that one posted weird.
But she STILL has her social media, but she scrubbed it so no one could find anything to use against her. Wonder what things she pulled down that she didn’t want people to know.
Where in the story does it say she scrubbed her social media?
Don’t tell me what to do lib.
