There is nothing but opinion in regards to Trump assisting or stifling Balderson’s run. But he was trending down, in some polls losing, Trump stepped in, and he pulled out a win. Sure looks like assisting to me.
Rush Limbaugh. But WildRose apparently doesn’t watch these people.
The topic of dems calling for impeachment follows the Alinsky and Maxine Waters trend: I only ever read about these topics when a rightwing extremist is talking about it—or them—on this forum.
The cartoon news has infiltrated his thinking through osmosis, I guess. Somehow Rush says it, and WildRose, without hearing Rush say it, magically hears Rush say it anyway.
Aside from right-wing radio using it as a scare tactic for why this is the most important election of our lifetime, I pretty much haven’t heard about it either. I could of course be in a filter bubble but most of the liberals I interact with are pretty happy with Mueller’s pace in their investigation, and some of my liberals friends are even okay with Trump for the full term to give Republicans a chance to show what their policies really do for the country and demonstrate how effectively they can lead (hopefully good right!).
There’s of course the general crazy news sites that both sides have. dailykos? ugh
I’d be surprised if Balderson didn’t win even after the provisional ballots. I do wonder what this means in terms of strategy in three months… do Democrats keep spending money or give up on this seat?
Both sides will spend a lot less. its a swing district now which this election means it gets some money from both sides. But a lot less than a special election.
Because campaigns cost money. Also, if you’ve happened to work for any campaign, the goal isn’t to win by a wide margin. That’s just a happy side effect if it happens, since it’s a binary victory. You want to optimize the amount of money spent such that you will gain the margin necessary to win. There are logistical reasons why this doesn’t happen exactly but ideally this would be how a party should make investments. There are other factors like PR where you would want to violate this as well.
So you could argue that the GOP spent pretty much the right amount of money. They didn’t need +20% or +10%, you simply need to beat the other candidate.
I actually am not sure if there is really a blue wave. I think political campaigns in general have gotten much better at analytics.