There are lots of differing opinions among Christians about a lot of things in the Bible. List the “good” things that tobacco does for the body. List the benefits it provides for society. How about alcohol and illicit drugs? I believe there’s can reason these things are called vices.
Wouldn’t buying a new car instead of used kind of align here? It seems it would also be a poor stewardship of money, funding selfishness or vanity.
There seem to be a lot of things that people buy for themselves and not the family. Expensive cars are but the tip of the iceberg of this poor stewardship of money.
Would tobacco be ok if the person is fabulously wealthy and the money he pays for tobacco doesn’t impinge on his family money?
"For John the Baptist has come eating no bread and drinking no wine and you say, “He has a demon. The Son of man has come eating and drinking, and you say, 'Behold, a glutton and a drunkard…!” Luke 7 I don’t think they would have accused Him of being a drunkard or winebibber if he had only drank grape juice.
I don’t know about the raging alcoholic, but yes he did plant a vineyard and made wine.
Speaking about the uses, Proverbs 31 “Give strong drink to him who is perishing, and wine to those in bitter distress; let them drink and forget their poverty, and remember their misery no more.” There is proper uses for strong drink.
You either didn’t read, or chose to ignore my posts on wealth. It is not wealth by itself, or what a person does with their wealth that is the problem. It is when the accumulation of wealth or the things it buys is put ahead of God that is the problem. Yes, buying a car could be a problem, but buying a car is more a necessity in today’s America than a luxury. Rather then me listing all the possible legitimate useful and beneficial reasons that people buy cars for, how about you list all the legitimate, useful and beneficial reasons people buy tobacco for? I’m guessing your list would be much shorter and faster to type than mine…
The Bible listed one instance of Noah’s drunkeness, and also noted the unspecified bad consequence of that incident. Hardly solid evidence to conclude he was a raging drunk OR an example to demonstrate the benefits of drinking. It is possible for people to drink without becoming alcoholics. The question about vice and Jesus still remains unanswered.
Yet they accused him of blasphemy, breaking the Sabbath, being a threat to the peace and other sins too and then crucified him. You believe they wouldn’t lie about him being a drunk? Why is that when EVERY OTHER ACCUSATION AGAINST HIM WAS A LIE?