Oath Keepers leader found guilty of seditious conspiracy

[bigtwnvin]

@Steel-W0LF

The Oath Keepers had one thing in common with BLM.

They were great when they were a grass roots ideal, much less great when some one took the name and created an organization around it.

Just curious how much donated money did the Oath Keepers hierarchy direct into personal enrichment? How many homes have they purchased?
I will agree the Oath Keepers took a wrong turn and went off the rails. BLM? A cheap street hustle and a criminal enterprise in my opinion. When will the federal goobermint and the taxman be hauling them into court on RICO charges? That story kind of died away, does skin pigmentation allow for a pass or is holding thieves criminally accountable racist?

[Jezcoe]

@bigtwnvin

Just curious how much donated money did the Oath Keepers hierarchy direct into personal enrichment? How many homes have they purchased?

Stewart Rhodes used the money to live high on the hog while leaving his wife and kids to live in squalor in the woods. A quick google search of how he treated his own family is easily found.

@bigtwnvin

I will agree the Oath Keepers took a wrong turn and went off the rails.

The Oath Keepers were at the Bundy Ranch and some members almost got into a shootout with other militias. They then showed up at Furgeson to provide “security” and then when kicked out of there by the police returned to provide “security” for Infowars “reporter” Joe Biggs who is also up on Seditious Conspiracy charges.

They were never on the rails.

They are not your allies.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@RTchoke

@Jezcoe

@Samm

And? What happened?

I get that there has to be a need to ignore that there were two right wing figures who have been part of the movement going back to the Bundt Ranch kerfuffle who have been convicted of Seditious Conspiracy because ITS JUST NOT FAIR!!! THERE ARE FACELESS ANARCHISTS WHO WE THINK DID THE SAME THING!!! WAHHHHHH!!!

How about some focus?

I get you love the double standard and applaud it. I don’t think @Samm is the one that needs to ■■■■■■■ FOCUS.

https://twitter.com/KCProsecutor/status/1279135967962521602?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1279135967962521602|twgr^99289d7cc6c373cbf60d9d171d01bfe3a38349d6|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftherightscoop.com%2Fpathetic-prosecutors-will-not-press-any-charges-against-peaceful-protesters-arrested-at-chop-chaz%2F

Those are no non- violent protestors who were arrested when the police shut the whole thing down. Most of those people were charged with resisting arrest… not seditious conspiracy.

I know that you guys have to grasp onto the tiniest thing to somehow make Stewart Rhodes a victim of his own actions but to compare local charges to federal sedition charges… its dumb and no one takes it seriously.

Seriously? Who has used the word “victim” for Stewart Rhodes besides you?

[Samm]

@PurpnGold

@Rodeo

Nahhhh…those people at the 570 BLM/Antifa riots who killed a couple of dozen Americans and did billions in property damage were all patriots…the ones burning down pregnancy counseling centers are great Americans

Anyone who was caught damaging businesses, during the 2020 riots, were arrested and charged.

Sure they were …

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Rodeo

@Jezcoe

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Nobody is defending anyone. I’m guessing most Americans have no idea who the hell Stuart Rhoads even is.

We are laughing at the obsession with him and the whole January 6 thing. Most of us have moved on.

What’s a Stewart Rhodes…. Very funny.

You created a false flag, ran it up the flagpole and nobody saluted. Now you’re miffed.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Rodeo

@Jezcoe

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Nobody is defending anyone. I’m guessing most Americans have no idea who the hell Stuart Rhoads even is.

We are laughing at the obsession with him and the whole January 6 thing. Most of us have moved on.

What’s a Stewart Rhodes…. Very funny.

You created a false flag, ran it up the flagpole and nobody saluted. Now you’re miffed.

Stewart Rhodes being convicted of seditious conspiracy is not a false flag.

The wondering about faceless anarchists at CHOP because of that conviction is pretty funny.

How hard is it to just be happy that a traitorous ■■■■■■■ is getting Justice without having to ask about those who are supposedly on the “other team”.

Anarchists hate Democrats and Stewart Rhodes would be willing to murder anyone that he saw as his political enemy… Republicans included.

[Samm]

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

I don’t Know… seems like the whatabout blah blah happening isn’t a good look when commenting on a guy who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

[WuWei]

Good. Lock him up.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Smyrna

@Jezcoe

What jury when presented with a plan that Rhodes himself had to attempt to overthrow the government for Donald Trump would find him not guilty of having a conspiracy to overthrow the government?

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Now…rise above your pettiness and demand…“equal justice for all”.

Sure. And justice was served here, as best as humans can provide. They were provided a jury of peers, adequate counsel, and have the whole array of appeal options open to them.

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

I don’t Know… seems like the whatabout blah blah happening isn’t a good look when commenting on a guy who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Oh, you know alright. You played your gambit and you lost. And now you’re playing dumb. Pathetic.

[WuWei]

That’s not justice, that’s due process.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Rodeo

@Jezcoe

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Nobody is defending anyone. I’m guessing most Americans have no idea who the hell Stuart Rhoads even is.

We are laughing at the obsession with him and the whole January 6 thing. Most of us have moved on.

What’s a Stewart Rhodes…. Very funny.

You created a false flag, ran it up the flagpole and nobody saluted. Now you’re miffed.

Please explain: what is the false flag here?

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

I don’t Know… seems like the whatabout blah blah happening isn’t a good look when commenting on a guy who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Oh, you know alright. You played your gambit and you lost. And now you’re playing dumb. Pathetic.

A gambit in a thread that is about Oath Keepers getting convicted of Seditious Conspiracy and by post 7 there is Whatabout CHOP… Whatabout BLM… it is entertaining.

[Samm]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Rodeo

@Jezcoe

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Nobody is defending anyone. I’m guessing most Americans have no idea who the hell Stuart Rhoads even is.

We are laughing at the obsession with him and the whole January 6 thing. Most of us have moved on.

What’s a Stewart Rhodes…. Very funny.

You created a false flag, ran it up the flagpole and nobody saluted. Now you’re miffed.

Please explain: what is the false flag here?

That conservatives here are defending Rhodes.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

Okay. Thank you.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Rodeo

@Jezcoe

There is no reason to defend Stewart Rhodes.

He is not your ally.

Nobody is defending anyone. I’m guessing most Americans have no idea who the hell Stuart Rhoads even is.

We are laughing at the obsession with him and the whole January 6 thing. Most of us have moved on.

What’s a Stewart Rhodes…. Very funny.

You created a false flag, ran it up the flagpole and nobody saluted. Now you’re miffed.

Please explain: what is the false flag here?

That conservatives here are defending Rhodes.

All I have seen is complaints about “double standards”

[Samm]

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

I don’t Know… seems like the whatabout blah blah happening isn’t a good look when commenting on a guy who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Oh, you know alright. You played your gambit and you lost. And now you’re playing dumb. Pathetic.

A gambit in a thread that is about Oath Keepers getting convicted of Seditious Conspiracy and by post 7 there is Whatabout CHOP… Whatabout BLM… it is entertaining.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

[Jezcoe]

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Jezcoe

@Samm

You making the accusation that we © are defending him is the false flag.

I don’t Know… seems like the whatabout blah blah happening isn’t a good look when commenting on a guy who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy.

Oh, you know alright. You played your gambit and you lost. And now you’re playing dumb. Pathetic.

A gambit in a thread that is about Oath Keepers getting convicted of Seditious Conspiracy and by post 7 there is Whatabout CHOP… Whatabout BLM… it is entertaining.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

The point that it is impossible to bring up Oath Keepers without doing a “Whatabout”?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

Well…double standards and a rigged system