Anyway, I’m not going to rehash this again, my opinion is formulated off of plenty of evidence and at this point, it’s not up for debate. Want to convince me? Make all of the data public, including the mail in ballots. Oh wait, you can’t. They were destroyed in most cases. Doesn’t matter at this point aside from the fact that we need to ensure we have voter ID and we need to tighten up the chain of custody across the board. We need to abolish drop boxes and force people to show up in person to vote unless they physically cannot do it. I can accept a loss, what I cannot accept is when people try to silence debate by banning social media accounts and repeating the lie that it was the “safest, most secure election in US history”… From my experience, when people try to silence debate, they’re hiding something. It’s the exact reason why I completely reject the man made global warming nonsense as we keep hearing morons say things like “The science is settled”. That’s a pathetic attempt to silence debate and that’s not only ignorant, it’s dangerous.
Specifically what issues do the Democrats of the 1800’s and today agree upon?
As far as the rest of the post… it is seriously some word salad nonsense.
It is like throwing a darts at a board and making tenuous connections.
Take the Slavery/abortion comparison, which is just incredibly stupid on its face and is not made in good faith at all.
Slavery was intrinsic to the economy of the nation. It was the most important issue of the first half of the 19th century. It was based on the denial of ownership of one’s own body. It caused a war.
Abortion, at its heart, is about the two conflicting and equal rights. The right for a Woman to have bodily autonomy and the right to life. You will never ever be able to square those two. So, until recently, we have relied on a system of shifting rights. Favorable towards bodily autonomy at the beginning of the pregnancy and tilting toward right to life over time.
You cannot in good faith make it that chattel slavery and reproductive rights are the same issue.
Oh come now! Haven’t you heard? “There was no widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election”. The voter fraud was intentionally concentrated and limited to a few battleground states which decided the election, and not widespread throughout the entire united States.
JWK
They are not “liberals” or “progressives”. They are Socialist Revolutionaries, the very kind who took over Cuba and now rule over the people with an iron fist.
It’s still a completely bonkers, evidence free conspiracy crafted in service as to lay the justification for a months long, wide ranging plot from Trump and dozens of MAGA Republicans. Clarence Thomas’ powerful and lunatic wife was pushing hard on it.
Nobody can even come up with a workable theory that doesn’t rely on magical thinking on how it could even be possible to slip in 100 votes without detection without turning into Sydney Powell.
I have no clue what you mean by “silencing debate” just on our little forum alone we have a long running thread about the “stolen election” which is still actively posted in. Its all Trump talks about, it has come up in every single GOP primary debate, half of all Republicans believe the lie.
Have you not been following the independent audit of Maricopa county launched by Senate Republicans in AZ and the ninjas?
Personally I am fine with the delusions of stolen election, it will sink the GOP’s chances in the next presidential election if its a rehashing of 2020 by Trump.
The party knows this the pivot is in the works, keep MAGA ditch Trump its a balancing act since so many have bought into this outright lie but if it works it will set up the GOP big in the next presidential.
Desantis is loading the revolver as we speak and he is gonna put Trump out to pasture
Getting back to the subject of the thread, the Revolutionary Democrat Party Leadership’s desire to create a federal Ministry of Truth, which will exercise legislative, executive, and judiciary powers, is the very definition of tyranny as stated by James Madison in Federalist No. 47.
JWK
“If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection [1st Amendment freedom of speech] was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?”___ Justice Story
Our socialist revolutionaries [those in control of the Democrat Party] are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
JWK
They are not “liberals” or “progressives”. They are Socialist Revolutionaries, the very kind who took over Cuba and now rule over the people with an iron fist.
Yup! You clearly ignored the outright shenanigans of the Democrat Party Leadership.
JWK
The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations, and likewise detests a free market, free enterprise system.