Mass shootings make up only a small fraction of the homicides in the US. Are homicides less abhorrent if they happen as separate events rather than several at one time?
Knives are involved in several times as many homicides rifles. Logically regulations on knives would have more value in terms of reducing homicides.
If the number of deaths at one time are the only criteria, then the US is well down on the list:
France and Norway both have tighter gun laws, but have had bigger mass shootings. What basis there to believe that tighter gun laws would do anything to prevent mass shootings?
Planes and motor vehicles have killed far more than guns in mass attacks. Is death by rental truck somehow better than death by gunfire?
Really? Based on the link you provided, all gun types combined are responsible for nearly 11,000 deaths, compared to 1,591 for knives/stabbing weapons but youāre going to cherry pick the rifle subgroup?
You are right. The confidentiality rules prevent therapists from squealing on their patients (which is the primary reason that the data base the FBI has access to to deny a gun purchase is so devoid of the names of the mentally ill ā¦ who constitute the vast majority of mass shooters) so they (as a profession) are morally bound to do whatever they can to prevent any patient that they believe is possibly the next mass killer from carrying out that act. If they refuse to submit the names of dangerously unstable patients to authorities and the data base, then they should shoulder the responsibility to defuse the sick mind or bear much of the blame if the crime is committed.
China is not a good example they just locked a million people they didnāt like in detention camps according the UN. If anything they are the poster boy on what government can do to unarmed citizens.
@Bill.in.PA No fair using the ārifle subgroupā just because thatās what we want to ban! You have to include all guns so we can ban assault weapons!
It drives gun-grabbers completely crazy when you say it, and admittedly, it has become trite, but it is absolutely true ā¦ āGuns do not kill people; people kill people.ā
Iām sure their irrational reaction to that statement is because they have nothing to counter it with and they know it.