Let's Put The Lie In The Grave - MAGA Fraud RIP

[Nemesis]

Lol for real.

[Snowfinch]

Patient still has a weak pulse. Maybe just stash it in hospice for awhile. Perhaps a thoughtful nurse will come by and put it down humanely.

[rp5x5]

What happens when the Uniparty goes to town on XMAS—when Trump is in exile, due to the globalist coup which is applauded by all hypocrits.

ANOTHER NASTY SURPRISE: GOP Sellouts Gave Biden Regime $11 MILLION to Target...

[BlueHeron]

@Roxiebelle

I disagree with Sean.

I honestly don’t understand what you disagree with? That he testified under oath? That he stated, “I did not believe it for one second?” I’m not trying to be confrontational and I’m medicated right now, so I really don’t understand.

[Steel-W0LF]

I think it depends on what a person considers fraud.

I don’t think there was massive ballot stuffing or vote switching, though I do believe mail-in voting makes those things more likely.

I do think things were done that both influenced voters, notably the social media story suppression. I also think many states illegally changed election rules without doing it the proper way because “PanDemiC!!!1!”.

[TommyLucchese]

@Camp

If the process were beyond reproach he would not be able to.

There are too many loose ends and weak spots.

I want his to look and think forward.

Tough for an octogenarian to do.

Here’s the hilarious part. When this all started I was convinced this was going to be a way bigger fight because at the state and local level American elections have always been a disaster. Always. Didn’t even reach the standards we impose on other countries.

But it turns out that thanks to the Help America Vote Act, one of the only 2000s bipartisan bills, linking SSNs to voting registrations has literally almost entirely eliminated voter fraud. It has eliminated large scale stuff like dead people voting entirely.

Trump proved how clean our election system is.

[BlueHeron]

Ok, it must be me. I thought she was talking about the Sean Hannity article. Just couldn’t understand what the disagreement was, the article was straight forward.

[WuWei]

@BlueHeron

I honestly don’t understand what you disagree with? That he testified under oath? That he stated, “I did not believe it for one second?” I’m not trying to be confrontational and I’m medicated right now, so I really don’t understand.

He abandoned the SS Trump.

[WuWei]

@Steel-W0LF

I don’t think there was massive ballot stuffing or vote switching, though I do believe mail-in voting makes those things more likely.

Based on it not happening.

[WuWei]

@TommyLucchese

because at the state and local level American elections have always been a disaster. Always. Didn’t even reach the standards we impose on other countries.

That is a ridiculous statement and not at all true. And a slap in the face of every election volunteer and official everywhere.

Stop spreading disinformation. F6.

[WuWei]

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

He was. The sole charge of his 2nd impeachment.

[FloridaYankee]

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

Kindly show any post of mine supporting any of that.

No. It’s a MAGA Collective thing. But you’re still trying it in this thread.

Let the myth die.

Eighty FBI agents at twitter alone tipping the scales. Sorry, it was rigged. And that’s not counting who knows how many other government stooges accessing their direct portal to infringe on Americans speech.

In 2016 I was told social media didn’t change one vote and it was not said in a nice way. The very notion was scoffed at with derision and sarcasm as one of the stupidest ideas ever put forward.

Yes if the govt. squelched free speech they should be smacked down in the most public manner possible, but I have it on good authority that;

SOCIAL MEDIA DIDN’T CHANGE ONE VOTE!!!

[zantax]

@WuWei

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

He was. The sole charge of his 2nd impeachment.

Please, partisan nonsense, go get a court conviction.

[WuWei]

Bit different when it’s the USG, isn’t it?

[WuWei]

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

He was. The sole charge of his 2nd impeachment.

Please, partisan nonsense, go get a court conviction.

Was the Senate not convicting also “partisan nonsense”?

The impeachment in the House was bipartisan.

Trump was President on Jan 6th. Congress is the court for Presidents.

[zantax]

@WuWei

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

He was. The sole charge of his 2nd impeachment.

Please, partisan nonsense, go get a court conviction.

Was the Senate not convicting also “partisan nonsense”?

The impeachment in the House was bipartisan.

Trump was President on Jan 6th. Congress is the court for Presidents.

He is no longer President, no incitement charge.

[WuWei]

@zantax

He is no longer President, no incitement charge.

He was already charged.

[zantax]

@WuWei

@zantax

He is no longer President, no incitement charge.

He was already charged.

Double jeopardy doesn’t apply, try again.

[WuWei]

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

He is no longer President, no incitement charge.

He was already charged.

Double jeopardy doesn’t apply, try again.

I didn’t say anything about double jeopardy.

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

Is incorrect. He has been charged with incitement. It was a bipartisan charge.

[zantax]

@WuWei

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

He is no longer President, no incitement charge.

He was already charged.

Double jeopardy doesn’t apply, try again.

I didn’t say anything about double jeopardy.

@zantax

There is a reason he hasn’t been charged with incitement.

Is incorrect. He has been charged with incitement. It was a bipartisan charge.

If you want to go there you also have to accept the verdict.