I don’t care much for crooked and crazy which is why i dislike Brandon so much.
Might throw Piglosi and a few more in there too.
I don’t care much for crooked and crazy which is why i dislike Brandon so much.
Might throw Piglosi and a few more in there too.
But fair game to her if she can command that and people are willing to pay it.
That raises a question. Are people typically paid for convention speeches? It seems to me that, in that particular venue, people are there because they want to be and believe in the cause.
On the other hand, if you have a bunch of donations that you want to launder, it makes sense.
$60 Large for yapping around three minutes ya say?
Good work if you can get it.
But that’s chump change compared to pro sports contracts. Ball players getting paid millions to produce zilch.
Negotiating a contract is challenging for both the individual and the front office. Teams want to pay as little as possible for the most future value, and players typically seek every possible dollar for their hard work in the past...
I love Bobby Bonilla’s deal. He could drop dead and his estate still gets a check for over a million bucks until 2035!
His agent should be running the Fed fer crissakes!
$60 Large for yapping around three minutes ya say?
Good work if you can get it.
But that’s chump change compared to pro sports contracts. Ball players getting paid millions to produce zilch.
The 10 Worst Contracts in Sports
I love Bobby Bonilla’s deal. He could drop dead and his estate still gets a check for over a million bucks until 2035!
His agent should be running the Fed fer crissakes!
Interesting, not a single football player on the list. I’d think Brock Osweiler’s deal would be up there. Now we’ll see what happens with Deshaun Watson.
Edit: something else I just noticed - Andrew Wiggins is on the list. He’s actually been earning that money of late !
It’s who is doing it, not that it is being done. That’s my take on it.
Yep. “We” have seen this before and I don’t like it from either side but it’s being done.
“Well, I don’t know. That’s what they offered,” she said when asked about the fees by CNN host Anderson Cooper in a forum televised by the network.
You got us. We won’t vote for Kimberly Guilfoyle for anything, now!
So what?
People gave money to support election fraud claims.
Trump gave that money to his family and friends.
You got us. We won’t vote for Kimberly Guilfoyle for anything, now!
Will you vote for the guy that took money from his supporters to supposedly investigate election fraud and instead gave that money to Kim?
Yep. “We” have seen this before and I don’t like it from either side but it’s being done.
Did that money come from supporters who gave the money to a PAC that didn’t exist?
Of course. They’re not Kim Guilfoyle, after all!
Lock her up!
Lock her up!
Lock her up!
Did that money come from supporters who gave the money to a PAC that didn’t exist?
No…it came from bankrupted, retired Americans where when the law was changed in 1999, allowed Goldman Sachs to make high risk loans, package them, rate them themselves and then sell them to unsuspecting investors who lost their life’s savings. So if you’re applying a lib standard, which one is worse?
Of course. They’re not Kim Guilfoyle, after all!
Lock her up!
Lock her up!
Lock her up!
Why would anyone lock up Kim? She was paid to do a job.
But the fact that the money was collected from people who wanted to investiate the 2020 election, that is a problem.
Why is that a problem, did you contribute?
No…it came from bankrupted, retired Americans where when the law was changed in 1999, allowed Goldman Sachs to make high risk loans, package them, rate them themselves and then sell them to unsuspecting investors who lost their life’s savings. So if you’re applying a lib standard, which one is worse?
Wah?
You are losing the plot.
Here, let’s try this -
Imagine people gave money to HRC to investigate the 2016 election.
And the PAC that they sent money to didn’t existing.
And HRC used that money to hire Chelsea’s boyfriend to give a 2 minute speech.
What would you say about that?
Why is that a problem, did you contribute?
We should only be concerned about things that directly affect us…
The rule of law means nothing.
Is this another Rove indicted thread?
Wah?
You are losing the plot.
Here, let’s try this -
Imagine people gave money to HRC to investigate the 2016 election.
And the PAC that they sent money to didn’t existing.
And HRC used that money to hire Chelsea’s boyfriend to give a 2 minute speech.
What would you say about that?
Dude…your post proves your principals are in the gutter.
Is this another Rove indicted thread?
I haven’t read anyone claim Kim was indicted. Did I miss something?
Did you give money to Trump’s Defense Election Fun?
Dude…your post proves your principals are in the gutter.
Ironic post is ironic.
And HRC used that money to hire Chelsea’s boyfriend to give a 2 minute speech.
Who was Hillary’s Vice Chair in the Clinton Foundation? Why do you only have one eye open?