those are two strong women you just mentioned.
Women with voices and opinions.
and just like that, all the posts in the thread are about lil ol me.
Its like being invited to a party, you RSVP. only to find out later there were stipulations to the invite that were placed 2 weeks later.
Hogwash.
Allan
yeah. weird.
and just like that, all the posts in the thread are about lil ol me.
Its that you dot understand the situation.
AOC called Barr’s bluff and now he changes the game from poker to go fish.
Allan
thinkingman:and just like that, all the posts in the thread are about lil ol me.
Its that you dot understand the situation.
AOC called Barr’s bluff and now he changes the game from poker to go fish.
Allan
No - it’s that the posters having no recourse in the argument and so go personal. it’s ok i’m used to it
please show where she was “disinvited”
fyi - you havent yet
please show where she was “disinvited”
fyi - you havent yet
Placing conditions on on unconditional accepted invitation is a disinvite.
you dont like the verbage. tough.
he is leonard pitts Jr. take.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2019/apr/22/leonard-pitts-jr-gop-you-look-dopey-when-you-attac/
Allan
thinkingman:please show where she was “disinvited”
fyi - you havent yet
Placing conditions on on unconditional accepted invitation is a disinvite.
you dont like the verbage. tough.
he is leonard pitts Jr. take.
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2019/apr/22/leonard-pitts-jr-gop-you-look-dopey-when-you-attac/
Allan
that’s not a “disinvite”
he outright said the invitation still stands.
is he banking on her not apologizing? if she did, the hosted visit would still take place.
if she were “disinvited” there would not be a hosted visit no matter what.
you can post all the articles about how not to “mess with the AOC” you want it wont matter
your op, and the idiotic opinion article in it, is completely false
he outright said the invitation still stands.
unconditionally like the original invite?
that does not stand hence the term disinvite.
Allan
thinkingman:he outright said the invitation still stands.
unconditionally like the original invite?
that does not stand hence the term disinvite.
Allan
nah. putting a condition on an invite is not disinvite.
i understand that you have to maintain that weak semantic trick to save face from posting a false OP
double on down with the falseness
Why are you defending these jackwagons?
nah. putting a condition on an invite is not disinvite.
i understand that you have to maintain that weak semantic trick to save face from posting a false OP
double on down with the falseness
the original unconditional invitation that was accepted by AOC was rescinded (if that term is better for you). It was replaced by a conditional invitation that AOC rejected. is that clear enough for you?
Allan
party-free:It’s not an opinion that the topic of AOC calling out of Crenshaw has nothing to do with the topic of jobs and colon Kentucky.
it’s an opinion that barr used this as an excuse to avoid facing the brilliant, brave widdle firebrand that has colbert and 60 minutes all agog
and it’s a very unfounded, stretch of an opinion. based on her dumb ass ditz tweet as though everyone “fears” her
Uncivil post complaining about uncivil Congresspeople noted yet again.
Please don’t stop!
thinkingman:nah. putting a condition on an invite is not disinvite.
i understand that you have to maintain that weak semantic trick to save face from posting a false OP
double on down with the falseness
the original unconditional invitation that was accepted by AOC was rescinded (if that term is better for you). It was replaced by a conditional invitation that AOC rejected. is that clear enough for you?
Allan
nothing was rescinded. you’re still just playing tricks with the semantics
sorry
nothing was rescinded. you’re still just playing tricks with the semantics
sorry
The original unconditional invite was rescinded (canceled) replaced by a conditional invite 2 weeks later.
It was a punk ass move by the congressman.
Allan
thinkingman:nothing was rescinded. you’re still just playing tricks with the semantics
sorry
The original unconditional invite was rescinded (canceled) replaced by a conditional invite 2 weeks later.
It was a punk ass move by the congressman.
Allan
there was no “cancel” (rescind) then “replace” of the invite
thinkingman:nothing was rescinded. you’re still just playing tricks with the semantics
sorry
The original unconditional invite was rescinded (canceled) replaced by a conditional invite 2 weeks later.
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
And I was curious so I read what prompted trhebcall for an apology. If that requires an apology before the visit then Barr doesn’t belong in politics. I hear worse every day during campaign season.
thinkingman:based on her dumb ass ditz tweet as though everyone “fears” her
when people start making posts like that it makes me think they are afraid of women.
or maybe women in positions of power.
not everyone can be as smart as sarah palin.
Barr the Coward is now TM’s hero… lol