Too late.

Judge in Hunter Biden's gun case makes rulings on evidence ahead of June trial
A judge said contents from a laptop Hunter Biden left at a Delaware repair shop as well as his drug use can be used as evidence.
Too late.
Guvnah:
Already explained to you by someone else.
The endless reference to thee response that occurred some time ago that no one can quite put their finger on. Reminds me of the tapes that we were promised would show President Biden accepting bribes. Except no one had ever heard those tapes and no one could find them.
All I see here is people who seem unwilling to explain of support their point insisting that the support out there.
WuWei:
A while yet…
Hunter Biden is in court in Delaware. Here's what he doesn't want the jury to hear | Fox News
What does that article have to do with my point.
How many other gun cases would Fox give a headline to? Why this one? You know the answer
Its rich to suggest that the right wing does not routinely tie the behavior of individuals to others in their family.
It’s not just FOX.
A judge said contents from a laptop Hunter Biden left at a Delaware repair shop as well as his drug use can be used as evidence.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/24/politics/hunter-biden-delaware-case/index.html
The trial of President Joe Biden's son is set to begin June 3.
I could go on …
Guvnah:
A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest.
(Simon and Garfunkel, “The Boxer”)“I can see for miles and miles and miles” Pete Townshend.
We can keep quoting classic rock lyrics; wha you seem completely unwilling to do is engage on the topic.
The topic was discussed ad nauseam … to its death. You lost.
Now were just kicking the can back and forth having fun.
I could go on …
With your demonstration that politicians are held accountable for family member’s actions. You are undermining Alito’s “my wife did it” defense. Are you doing that on purpose?
The topic was discussed ad nauseam … to its death. You lost.
If I actually lost, someone could point out where. Instead we’ve had scores of demonstrations of the fear of actually letting a point go on the right. What I see is a steam of insults and distractions because no one has a viable counter argument.
What does that article have to do with my point.
You asked a question. There’s your answer. Are you ok?
Cratic3947:
It’s sad that the dems have so little to offer the American people as a reason to elect them that all they can do is try to take people out of office or keep them from running.
How about offering solutions?
You don’t like their solutions. They don’t legislate for you.
They aren’t solutions, but true.
We have pols and SCOTUS judges receiving mountains of money and gifts…and that is all legalized, thanks to…our SCOTUS.
Lie. Debunked
Samm:
I could go on …
With your demonstration that politicians are held accountable for family member’s actions. You are undermining Alito’s “my wife did it” defense. Are you doing that on purpose?
I have never said that. Quit gaslighting.
If I actually lost, someone could point out where.
I’m guessing about 9th grade.
Samm:
The topic was discussed ad nauseam … to its death. You lost.
If I actually lost, someone could point out where. Instead we’ve had scores of demonstrations of the fear of actually letting a point go on the right. What I see is a steam of insults and distractions because no one has a viable counter argument.
Point it out? Okay, read the thread from the beginning. You were trounced. And not just by me; but by everyone you engaged with. The best you could come up with was that you feel like you are owed an apology. Pathetic.
shall not be infringed…
shall not be infringed…
Indeed. Welcome to the Constitution. Are you sure you’re ready for other people’s freedom?
Now perhaps you can indicate the right to throw guns into dumpsters near schools? I’ve been wanting to do that for a while.
Inverted flags were used by J6 rioters. and had become a symbol of the ‘stop the steal’ movement.
Whether he did it on purpose or accident. It should not happened. But it’s not impeachable and I love the way he votes. So I’m moving on.
Why shouldn’t it happen?
He give up his 1st Amendment rights when he became an ephor?
Is this objective?
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said Friday that she has at times become emotional over actions taken by the Court, saying she at times feels "desperation."
just highlights her basic unfitness for the job
Is this objective?
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor says she cries after some decisions | Fox News
Are you crying!? There’s no crying in the Supreme Court!!!
And here we have it from a sitting federal judge appointed by Clinton.
First he lies… and takes a side
Taking sides in this way erodes that trust," Ponsor, a senior judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, continued, criticizing the Supreme Court.
Then he relegates women to appendages
Being a judge’s spouse is not easy. On the one hand, a person should not have to forfeit the right to free expression at the marriage altar. On the other hand, it is not unreasonable to expect a spouse to avoid embarrassing a loved one or complicating his or her professional life,"
Get control of your woman!
Judge Michael Ponsor, a federal judge appointed by Bill Clinton, weighed in on the Justice Alito flag controversy on Friday and said it was unethical.