June 1-2, 2020 - President Trump and AG Barr IG - Report out on Lafayette Park was cleared for fence install

[Rodeo]

@biggestal99

Correct. He only sped it up for his photo op.

The facts are crystal clear.

Whatever makes you happy dude.

[biggestal99]

@Rodeo

Whatever makes you happy dude.

It’s in the IG report. If you care to read it.

Allan

[STODR]

@biggestal99

@Rodeo

Whatever makes you happy dude.

It’s in the IG report. If you care to read it.

Allan

Please post the quote “Trump ordered the clearing time line changed for his photo op”

[Rodeo]

From the Washington Post…

“When the U.S. Park Police led law enforcement officers into a crowd of mostly peaceful protesters outside Lafayette Square on June 1, 2020, including officers equipped with chemical irritants and officers on horseback, they did so as part of a plan made days earlier to build a fence around the park to protect officers, not to facilitate the visit minutes later by President Donald Trump to a nearby church, an inspector general’s report released Wednesday concluded.”

Later in the same story…” The report by the Interior Department’s inspector general focuses on the Park Police and does not fully address questions about the involvement of other agencies or the Trump administration in the events of June 1. Interior officials said they may not have heard all of the discussions that went on about the operation within the Secret Service or the White House, but that those discussions did not affect how and when the Park Police acted…”

Did not effect how and when Park police acted. And that’s from the Washington Post which was a prime peddler of the false narrative in the first place.

The smartest guy in the room class makes up these stories…and then at some point in the future…sadly usually after the damage has been done the truth comes out.

It’s a predictable pattern…

But forgive an old cowboy from taking some evil pleasure in watching another cherished narrative go thud.

[Ben_Natuf]

no they do not, they are assigned to departments. their job is to investigate and report their findings to the congress. and still, you are accusing the ig of being totally corrupt. what evidence do you have of his corruption other than it burst your narrative bubble?

[Ben_Natuf]

your facts aren’t very facty

. Interior officials said they may not have heard all of the discussions that went on about the operation within the Secret Service or the White House, but that those discussions did not affect how and when the Park Police acted…”

[biggestal99]

@STODR

Please post the quote “Trump ordered the clearing time line changed for his photo op”

At 6pm

“Are these people still going to be here when POTUS comes out?" Barr is quoted as saying, using an acronym for President of the United States.”

And 23 minutes later, the sweep began.

Allan

[Rodeo]

The Outnumbered show on Fox just played a montage of leftist media frauds (Joy Reid, that idiot Acosta from cnn) blistering Trump for tear gassing and attacking American citizens for a photo op.

A fellow named Ben Ferguson who worked at the White House just reminded us that 49 park police officers had been injured during the riots that also lit a historic church on fire (Maybe those were part of the “Peaceful Protests?)

And now we know libs lied again.

Which narrative will collapse next?

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

@WuWei

Do you know what “Unified Command” means?

Sure. The use of CS gas by the MPD or those who were under the unified command is not the only question arising from the events of that night. Other control measures were used by those under the unified command. Were those measures acceptable in context? That question was only investigated for the Parks Police.

It does not apply only to CS.

[biggestal99]

@Rodeo

The Outnumbered show on Fox just played a montage of leftist media frauds (Joy Reid, that idiot Acosta from cnn) blistering Trump for tear gassing and attacking American citizens for a photo op.

A fellow named Ben Ferguson who worked at the White House just reminded us that 49 park police officers had been injured during the riots that also lit a historic church on fire (Maybe those were part of the “Peaceful Protests?)

And now we know libs lied again.

Which narrative will collapse next?

Tear gas was not supposed to be used and protesters were not given adequate warning about the pending removal.

That is made perfectly clear in the report.

All of a sudden without warning the protestors where removed.

Allan

[Rodeo]

@biggestal99

Tear gas was not supposed to be used and protesters were not given adequate warning about the pending removal.

That is made perfectly clear in the report.

All of a sudden without warning the protestors where removed.

Allan

Dude your narrative is gone…the plan was to remove them days in advance. They should have been removed before they hurt all those people and put a historic church on fire…

Just move along.

Another leftist lie exposed.

[STODR]

@biggestal99

@STODR

Please post the quote “Trump ordered the clearing time line changed for his photo op”

At 6pm

“Are these people still going to be here when POTUS comes out?" Barr is quoted as saying, using an acronym for President of the United States.”

And 23 minutes later, the sweep began.

Allan

So he asked a question, so what. Interior officials said it didn’t affect how and when they did it.

Your assertions are false. Continuing to say it will make it a deliberate lie.

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@STODR

So he asked a question, so what. Interior officials said it didn’t affect how and when they did it.

Actually, they very carefully did not say that.

[WuWei]

P-anon.

[STODR]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@STODR

So he asked a question, so what. Interior officials said it didn’t affect how and when they did it.

Actually, they very carefully did not say that.

Yes they did:

@Ben_Natuf

. Interior officials said they may not have heard all of the discussions that went on about the operation within the Secret Service or the White House, but that those discussions did not affect how and when the Park Police acted…”

But go ahead

[TheDoctorIsIn]

I read the report, and it doesn’t say that.

You’re welcome to check: https://www.doioig.gov/reports/review-us-park-police-actions-lafayette-park

[biggestal99]

@Rodeo

Dude your narrative is gone…the plan was to remove them days in advance. They should have been removed before they hurt all those people and put a historic church on fire…

Just move along.

Another leftist lie exposed

I just provide you the facts of the case.

It’s all in the report.

How you spin it is your deal.

Here are the facts once again.

1. Protesters were to be removed to install fencing
2. Protesters were still there at 6pm
3. Barr came out and didn’t want protesters there when POTUS was
   Coming to park for photo op
4. Protestors removal began at 623pm
5. Protester removal was finished at 650pm

This is directly from the report. Unsure what narrative you speak of but these are the facts as they occurred.

Allan

[STODR]

@TheDoctorIsIn

I read the report, and it doesn’t say that.

You’re welcome to check: https://www.doioig.gov/reports/review-us-park-police-actions-lafayette-park

Your link is to the summary not the report. The report on page 10.

" Both the USPP acting chief of police and the USPP incident commander stated they were not told a specific time for the President’s potential anival and that learning this information did not change their operational timeline. The USPP acting chiefofpolice said, “I can tell you with
100 percent ce1tainty that the Secret Service and the Park Police … timeline did not change the entire day.”

[ohknow35]

@Rodeo

Another leftist lie exposed.

It’s comin’ around.

[Rodeo]

@STODR

Both the USPP acting chief of police and the USPP incident commander stated they were not told a specific time for the President’s potential anival and that learning this information did not change their operational timeline. The USPP acting chiefofpolice said, “I can tell you with
100 percent ce1tainty that the Secret Service and the Park Police … timeline did not change the entire day.”

But but but Hannity board liberals???