holy leaking lock box Batman
They are all for this until the first parent of a gang member goes to jail for not turning in their kid despite knowing he was in one.
Did the kid commit a crime? If so, aiding and abetting is also a no no.
If the parents know their kid is in a gang and do nothing they would be just as guilty as the Crumbleys if that kid commits a murder.
If they gave a weapon to the kid knowing there was a chance he was going to kill someoneā¦Why shouldnāt they be?
If you are going to try and make some point by pointing elsewhere, at least pick a similar circumstance. Nothing regarding the Kyle Rittenhouse incident is compared to the Crumbley situation.
Should Adam Lanzaās mom have been prosecuted?
Why would a 15 year old need a handgun?
āNeedā? Probably because he āfeltā like having one.
Impenitent:your son was arrested for DWI so weāre taking your house mommy and daddy
Did I let him drink in the house and then give him the keys to the car?
You werenāt home ā¦ but there is no lock on your liquor cabinet or the spare car key drawer. You are at fault.
Right which is why manslaughter is ridiculous.
Is there a material difference between negligence resulting in death and involuntary manslaughter in Michigan?
Since the mother and soon the father were found guilty for their MINOR child, will that help his defense on appeal, since he was tried as an ADULT? Just trying to understand how the kid is both an adult and minor.
Excellent question. It would appear the State wants it both ways.
BlueHeron:This was not a left or right question
Actually it is.
No itās not.
WuWei: FreeAndClear:Right which is why manslaughter is ridiculous.
What would you charge?
Something to do with firearms and minors
But the DA had already declared the minor to be an adult. I wonder if that Genie can be put back into the bottle.
Did the kid commit a crime? If so, aiding and abetting is also a no no.
Itās only adding and abetting if you know there is intent to commit a crime.
zantax:If the parents know their kid is in a gang and do nothing they would be just as guilty as the Crumbleys if that kid commits a murder.
If they gave a weapon to the kid knowing there was a chance he was going to kill someoneā¦Why shouldnāt they be?
āIf there was a chanceā? There is always a chance.
You werenāt home ā¦ but there is no lock on your liquor cabinet or the spare car key drawer. You are at fault.
This scenario is closer to their caseā¦You took him to the liquor store and bought him what he wanted, and then taught him how to drive. You put the cars keys next to the liquor you just bought him and then went outā¦You are at fault.
There is always a chance.
Thereās better than a good chance if you know that kid is in a violent gang.
Whocares:Did the kid commit a crime? If so, aiding and abetting is also a no no.
Itās only adding and abetting if you know there is intent to commit a crime.
I asked if the parent knew the son committed a crime.
Samm:You werenāt home ā¦ but there is no lock on your liquor cabinet or the spare car key drawer. You are at fault.
This scenario is closer to their caseā¦You took him to the liquor store and bought him what he wanted, and then taught him how to drive. You put the cars keys next to the liquor you just bought him and then went outā¦You are at fault.
No it isnāt. You added several levels of complicity.
Samm:There is always a chance.
Thereās better than a good chance if you know that kid is in a violent gang.
Was their son in a violent gang?