Then flag it was if it insults you so much.
But, but, butā¦ we all arrived at the Pocahontas name independently. And thatās a fact.
What if the Trump campaign and associates went to Russia in recent years, even while actively campaigning?
What if Trump fawns over ex-KGB Putin, stating he has more faith in him than his own intelligence agencies?
What if, again, Trump praised the actions of Putin while simultaneously disparaging our own institutions?
Thereās now what if in this case about accepting Putinās assistanceā¦ Trump did and readily admits he would do it again.
Do you care? This ā ā ā ā is LITERALLY going on with the current administration that you rally behind every single dayā¦ and yet, here you are, trying to paint Dems in a bad light be creating a hypotheticalā¦ whereas the same situation is unfolding right now with your own POTUS. You really donāt understand the irony, do you?
You think a lot of ā ā ā ā that many of us attempt to correct you on, and yet you continueā¦
Accepting information from a source, or even paying to receive information from a source is not illegal. It is not collusion. Nor should it be illegal.
What would be illegal would be offering money for anyone, foreign or domestic, to illegally obtain information. That is collusion to commit a crime.
Itās the same logic used that allows whistle blowers information to be published by papers. Yet if a journalist asked someone to hack information it would be a crime.
^^^^ This. Itās truly is unbelievable that an American politician has to be told this.
Right? I used to laugh about thisā¦ But now, itās getting a little scary to watch just how easily many in the current GOP will shed any bit of integrity for the sole sake of āwinningāā¦ means donāt seem matter anymore, nor the avenues used to achieve themā¦ itās just an end game for them it seems.
āWeintraubās statement, however, did not clear up the question of whether information is a thing of value, an issue Mueller wrote was difficult to resolve.ā
No she really didnāt.
If she did then both candidates last election committed illegal acts.
Whatās this BS with libs caring about the laws, rules etc? Since when?
And?
Just the other night we had a long discussion where you essentially said you were being charitable to libs because you never tell them theyāre liarsā¦just that theyāre brainwashed.
Iāll use the words you said to me in defending that statementā¦when someone sees you saying things that are obviously incorrect, what are they supposed to think?
I said libs are brainwashed. Verse Jay is brainwashed or YOU are brainwashed.
See the difference? Words matter.
People on these boards are libs.
People on these boards have argued in support of climate change being real, which is the subject matter you choseā¦and left no room for doubt that you believed ALL who supported that assertion were brainwashed.
Broadbrushing is not allowed.
But no one flagged you in that conversation, now did they?
Actually I didnāt think I said all if my memory serves me correctā¦I believe I gave little wiggling room.
My posts are being flagged all the time.
As for libsā¦Iām going to continue using it in reference to left-wing authoritarians.
Iāll go back and checkā¦seeing as you called climate change/global warming āthe greatest fraud of the ageā (not the exact words but close enough for jazz), and pretty much stated that was an absolute objective fact that it was a fraud, Iām not sure how much wiggle room you could have left yourself.
Just for hell of it. When I use the word lib knowing my reference why I use that word do you see yourself as a authoritarian?
^^^ That has to rank in the top of the most hilariously idiotic post Iāve ever read.
But you said āā¦even if paying to receive the informationā¦ā. Why would you pay for something unless it was something of value?
Youāre struggling with this, arenāt you. You (for some odd reason) created a hypothetical about Bernie, that basically parallels what Trump has done with Russia over the last few yearsā¦
Desperation is showingā¦
Also, are you speaking to me as if Iām a ālibā or a āliberalā? Because I know how you feel about ālibsā and I would feel oh so insulted if it was the formerā¦ oh my
Im going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it was the latterā¦ I mean, youāve clearly shown in this thread that youāre not one to insult, right?
Sry, I got a little chuckle after that last partā¦lol
Personally, I think you get a rise by using the term ālibsā to broad-brush those of us who lean leftā¦But when called out on it, like I just did in my previous post, you back downā¦ āNo, youāre a liberal, but man those dirty commie libsā¦ā
In fact, have you ever called any of us on the left a ālibā? I donāt recall that you haveā¦ you just throw it around a lot like it means something.