Was Biden briefed on this drone strike specifically with all the details? Or was this an operations level decision?
1 Like
We don’t know. They won’t talk about it. Full cover up mode. Great question though.
You didn’t care about civilians casualties skyrocketing in the prior 4 years, so whining about them now is BDS crocodile tears.
Why do you think that should be an “or” question?
1 Like
4 Likes
If civilians were targeted the consequences should be prison. Now answer my question. Why was this civilian targeted?
Ok. I’m a terrible person. We already knew that. Now let’s move on.
Do you want to know why they killed a civilian family?
You don’t have proof civilians were targeted. Just that they were civilian casualties. We’ve killed tens of thousands of them over 20 years. You didn’t care until you could use it against Biden.
1 Like
Already answered. Civilian casualties of war. Everyone knows why this is an issue now and not last year or the year before or the year before or the year before.
Exactly!!!
That’s why we need them to answer instead of covering up. Why was an unconfirmed target selected? What made them think this social worker was the enemy?
Fair question?
He’ll get away with it because the Lib propaganda media will manipulate the narrative for him. You can see how many guppies they’ve already reeled in just based on the posts in this thread.
No. Casualties of war. That’s life. No one cares. Until someone can use it to express BDS.
Because our military intelligence thought they were connected to the Kabul airport attacks. The intelligence appears to have been wrong.
Speak for yourself. Millions do care. It’s all over conservative media. Otherwise it would not be a story. Even though you don’t care, do you have a problem with others demanding an explanation?
They talk about it in the article you posted in your OP.
Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said: “U.S. Central Command continues to assess the results of the airstrike in Kabul on Aug. 29. We won’t get ahead of that assessment. However, as we have said, no other military works harder than we do to prevent civilian casualties. Additionally, as Chairman Milley said, the strike was based on good intelligence, and we still believe that it prevented an imminent threat to the airport and to our men and women that were still serving at the airport.”
Why do you think that is?
Nobody is asking you. This is an assumption that you are not qualified to make. We need the Biden clowns to explain this. Not some internet junkie.
So, you ask if we should “dig deeper” for answers.
I say sure, you will find that it was a mistake.
You reply that the Biden Sdministration will not allow the finding.
So, why are you calling for an investigation if you are confident in a pre-ordained conclusion? I ask again: what is the point and purpose?*
You are calling for some new level of scrutiny that previous presidents were not subjected to, while simultaneously refusing to talk about the AUMF which allows this whole mess in the first place.
*The answer is that this is a bad faith exercise on your part. You don’t care about the casualties, you just want to continue complaining about Biden.
3 Likes
It’s a quote from the civil war aka before movies.
Allan
Well again, they explain why he was targeted in the article you posted in your OP. Granted that isn’t a statement from the military, but from a NYT article.
The Times reports that drone operators weren’t surveilling Ahmadi’s home before the airstrike, but had followed what they believed to be his vehicle during the day. The paper noted that not long after the strike, ISIS militants used a white Toyota Corolla — the same model as Ahmadi’s car — to launch missiles at Kabul’s airport.
