Wait, wait, wait.
So, you start off with an opinion of David Muir, followed by your opinion of how he begins the news program. He always uses that tone. Whether he starts off with severe weather, or a shooting. He’s not all bubbly and happy.
He then discusses how Trump responded to a NYT article. Of course Trump responds to something that has potential implications.
So, Muir discussing Trump and his response, along with exactly what the NYT released is an underhanded agenda?
Welp, I feel sorry for you, I really do. What Muir did was talk about what was released and Trump’s response. He didn’t give his opinion, he didn’t have 2 guests on discussing the issue. He told facts. NYT article/Trump response.
In your opinion, should have Muir ignored this? Maybe discuss caravans and drugs and sex trafficking of women and how Democrats hate America? Is that your definition of not being underhanded?