Right at the start of the encounter.
And Sneaky is right.
I’m on my property- I don’t have to show ID to prove I live there.
The cop was totally in the wrong.
Right at the start of the encounter.
And Sneaky is right.
I’m on my property- I don’t have to show ID to prove I live there.
The cop was totally in the wrong.
This is pure and simple…how Trump has been treated by the media during his entire term. They lie, libs eat, regurgibleet these fed lies throughout their day, wake up and repeat the next day.
All of us have witnessed this right here in Hannity Land and I’ve done my best to point out the sheople.
The regurgibleet coming from this sheep is the loudest of them all…
Well except for the fact that the City Council had just voted to tear it down … .
Which had nothing to do with the reason for the protest
A completely unsupportable fabrication on your part. Bravo for consistency.
Yes you do when you are suspected of a crime and are present where it was reported.
You can do it either before you are arrested voluntarily or you can do it by force after. Your choice.
No, you don’t. Not in Massachusetts and not in Texas.
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 41, § 98
Texas 38.02
Gates was in compliance with the law.
A completely unsupportable fabrication on your part. Bravo for consistency.
Try showing where the organizers said the protest was about saving the statue and not about advancing the pro-white movement. You can’t
Wrong, he had probable cause and a neighbor complaint, that gives them all they need to arrest you.
He did not have probable cause. He had the authority to ask the question from the street.
Jezcoe:The Henry Louis Gates incident was a clear example of the police acting stupidly.
There was no reason for the arrest.
The fact that people don’t want to admit that is crazy.
So in your world, police can not arrest someone for disorderly conduct?
How can one be disorderly in their own home?
WuWei:Wrongfully. There is no requirement for me to show my ID to a cop on my own front porch. That cop had no business even stepping foot on that man’s property without a warrant. The cop was trespassing.
The cop caused the “disorderly conduct” because Gates refused to submit. It was a humbling.
How is that to be legally determined then?
By asking. It is illegal to give a false name. He asked. Gates answered truthfully. End of discussion.
And you remain wrong. They had probable cause for arrest all along, he had the choice of providing ID before to avoid it or after.
It is the same in both states. “This is my house” won’t keep you from being arrested when they have probable cause unless you can prove it on the spot and are willing to.
Hell, he admitted to breaking and entering because the door was stuck.
Smyrna: Jezcoe:The Henry Louis Gates incident was a clear example of the police acting stupidly.
There was no reason for the arrest.
The fact that people don’t want to admit that is crazy.
So in your world, police can not arrest someone for disorderly conduct?
How can one be disorderly in their own home?
By creating a disturbance that leaves the confines of one’s own property.
And you remain wrong. They had probable cause for arrest all along, he had the choice of providing ID before to avoid it or after.
It is the same in both states. “This is my house” won’t keep you from being arrested when they have probable cause unless you can prove it on the spot and are willing to.
Hell, he admitted to breaking and entering because the door was stuck.
The arrest was made after it was determined by the police that he was in fact Henry Louis Gates and it was in fact his house.
The police acted stupidly.
Keep those goal posts on wheels, I realize it’s all you have.
The organizers are not responsible for the attendees or for why they are there.
Different people can have different motivations for showing up to protest.
The arrest was made because of interference once the supervisor arrived and for the making a public nuisance of himself for disorderly conduct.
How can one be disorderly in their own home?
How is that established?
The arrest was made because of interference once the supervisor arrived and for the making a public nuisance of himself for disorderly conduct.
Why were the police still there after it was determined that Gates was who he said he was and it was his house?
No crime had been committed.
And you remain wrong. They had probable cause for arrest all along, he had the choice of providing ID before to avoid it or after.
It is the same in both states. “This is my house” won’t keep you from being arrested when they have probable cause unless you can prove it on the spot and are willing to.
Hell, he admitted to breaking and entering because the door was stuck.
You don’t know the law. I do not have to produce ID in Texas even after I am arrested.
There is no requirement for me to produce ID in Massachusetts either.
There is no national ID requirement in the United States.
You are regurgitating myths perpetuated by police academies all over this country.
I do not have to prove myself innocent of police suspicion anywhere, much less on my own property.
Jezcoe:How can one be disorderly in their own home?
How is that established?
I’m asking you since you think it was all cool.
WildRose:The arrest was made because of interference once the supervisor arrived and for the making a public nuisance of himself for disorderly conduct.
Why were the police still there after it was determined that Gates was who he said he was and it was his house?
No crime had been committed.
To humble him for getting uppity.
Because he was raising holy hell.
The only reason it was dropped was because Obama interfering, the arrest was completely justified.
If you or I did the same thing we’d have taken the full ride and likely gotten a stiff fine.