The reason Hillary had her spies break into Trumps servers was to get something to show the FBI, so that they would investigate Trump and then Hillary could say she was not the only one being investigated by the FBI.
Remember she destroyed state department property to escape FOIA.
The reason Hillary had her spies break into Trumps servers was to get something to show the FBI, so that they would investigate Trump and then Hillary could say she was not the only one being investigated by the FBI.
Is this a conscious explicit lie on your part, or do you really believe that?
Russia has been on the “brink” of invading for weeks. Putin could be ■■■■■■■ with western minds. Biden may get nominated the Nobel Peace prize when Russia never has any intentions of invading.
Have you noticed Ukraine and Russia are making bank my not going to war. Ukraine gets billions from their bought and paid for Brandon admin, while Putin makes bank on high energy prices.
“Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an internet company to surveil servers at Trump Tower and the White House in order to link Donald Trump to Russia, a bombshell new legal filing alleges.”
Also, do you notice anything funny about this sentence?
“Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an internet company to surveil servers at Trump Tower and the White House in order to link Donald Trump to Russia, a bombshell new legal filing alleges.”
I, for one, would love to see the billing records that show Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign paid for an “internet company” to survey the White House during the Trump presidency. Then again, I would also like to walk up flights of Escher Stairs.
Durham said his office found “no support for these allegations,” claiming the supposed evidence Sussmann provided was incomplete and skewed.
The Post puts a refutation of all of this by Durham in its own story (which, as elsewhere posted in this thread, Durham layer confirms because he knows these claims are ■■■■ ) because a) The Post needs to cover its legal heinie and b) The Post is confident it’s target audience will gloss over this statement and glom onto the “sensational allegations” that already feed into said target audience’s inherent biases.
Gaslighting in action, complete with the evidence that gaslighting works.
Who Are Those ‘Techies’ Who Spied on Trump?
‘Benevolent posse’ or partisans for Hillary Clinton? John Durham has the answer.
The usual suspects are already circling the wagons around the techie “experts” who spied on Donald Trump. If their defense feels tired, it’s because we’ve been through it before. It’s Christopher Steele all over again.
Special counsel John Durham destroyed the last shreds of Mr. Steele’s credibility last year, proving that the paid-for-hire spook had relied on fabrications for the infamous dossier the Federal Bureau of Investigation used in its Trump probe. The special counsel is now dismantling that other big claim of Trump-Russia “collusion”—the Alfa Bank narrative. The wonder is that the press and others are stepping up for another humiliation—when the disturbing actions of the creators of the Alfa narrative are already so easy to document, and in their own words.
In recent court filings, Mr. Durham explains that these tech experts—including Rodney Joffe, formerly of Neustar, Inc.—were in cahoots with the same crew as Mr. Steele, using the same playbook. They worked with Democratic lawyers at Perkins Coie and opposition-research firm Fusion GPS, with the goal of dredging up “derogatory” information on Mr. Trump that would please “VIPs” in the Clinton campaign. The techies did so, the Durham indictment says, in part by mining protected internet data that had been supplied to a government contractor—allowing them to snoop on the White House as well as Trump Tower and Mr. Trump’s Manhattan apartment