Is China right concerning censorship?

[Jezcoe]

@STODR

■■■■■■■■ those suits were in large metropolitan areas with numerous bakers. They were not limited in choice. Being that some of them won do to what you actually said, “it was their forum”, as an artist. your hypocrisy is is shining.

State imposed public accommodation laws are not dependent on density.

Maybe they should be… but they aren’t.

Get rid of all public accommodation laws.

It will take a couple of decades for them to be reimposed because people just can’t help being ■■■■■■■■■ but go ahead. Lobby your State government to allow for discriminatory business practices.

But to bring this back to the OP’s complaint, the services that are being complained about are ones that are private and offered for free

So to complain that one can’t use another’s private platform however they wish… for free… is not really a conservative way to deal with things.

[Jezcoe]

@conan

You’re justifying your own hypocrisy. Those companies uses the internet for their existence, and that internet highway uses public access. It uses roads. bridges and other utilities all subsidized by our goverment.

Much like libs said that baker using public roads that brings them the goods needed…and customer base that he needs.

The internet is a public utility?

[conan]

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

[CanadianJudo]

@STODR

Funny you were not saying that when they were making people make them cakes. And yes that is the bakers platform.

You don’t need a business license to own a website.

[STODR]

@Jezcoe

@STODR

■■■■■■■■ those suits were in large metropolitan areas with numerous bakers. They were not limited in choice. Being that some of them won do to what you actually said, “it was their forum”, as an artist. your hypocrisy is is shining.

State imposed public accommodation laws are not dependent on density.

Maybe they should be… but they aren’t.

Get rid of all public accommodation laws.

It will take a couple of decades for them to be reimposed because people just can’t help being ■■■■■■■■■ but go ahead. Lobby your State government to allow for discriminatory business practices.

But to bring this back to the OP’s complaint, the services that are being complained about are ones that are private and offered for free

So to complain that one can’t use another’s private platform however they wish… for free… is not really a conservative way to deal with things.

That is the problem with you. You agree on one hand but not the other. I am consistent. They should both be allowed. In the case of the baker people should just make it go bankrupt like some did. Government should stay out of it, except in areas of essential need which a cake is not.

[Jezcoe]

@conan

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

That isn’t what is being asked.

Is the Internet classified as a public utility?

[CanadianJudo]

@conan

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

You could class access to the internet a “right”
but you can’t class access to twitter a “right”

[CanadianJudo]

@Jezcoe

@conan

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

That isn’t what is being asked.

Is the Internet classified as a public utility?

even if the internet was classified as a public utility.

Facebook would still be a private website.

[STODR]

You do if you are going to sell advertising. But good job at moving those goal posts.

[CanadianJudo]

@STODR

You do if you are going to sell advertising. But good job at moving those goal posts.

should I be allowed to post graphic porn on this website because its my “Right” to free speech.

[conan]

I don’t care what you’re asking. The fact remains the fiber optic are laid on public right aways.

Just like argument that baker is depended on on roadways for his clients and materials.

[STODR]

No, did I say you should?

[Jezcoe]

@STODR

@Jezcoe

@STODR

■■■■■■■■ those suits were in large metropolitan areas with numerous bakers. They were not limited in choice. Being that some of them won do to what you actually said, “it was their forum”, as an artist. your hypocrisy is is shining.

State imposed public accommodation laws are not dependent on density.

Maybe they should be… but they aren’t.

Get rid of all public accommodation laws.

It will take a couple of decades for them to be reimposed because people just can’t help being ■■■■■■■■■ but go ahead. Lobby your State government to allow for discriminatory business practices.

But to bring this back to the OP’s complaint, the services that are being complained about are ones that are private and offered for free

So to complain that one can’t use another’s private platform however they wish… for free… is not really a conservative way to deal with things.

That is the problem with you. You agree on one hand but not the other. I am consistent. They should both be allowed. In the case of the baker people should just make it go bankrupt like some did. Government should stay out of it, except in areas of essential need which a cake is not.

This is a Pollyanna view of public accommodation laws and why they exist.

The Libertarian “people will out then out of business” model has literally never been true.

As I said before.

Get rid of them.

We will see them come back because people can’t help themselves and not be ■■■■■■■■■

[CanadianJudo]

@STODR

No, did I say you should?

so you agree that censorship is allowed and free speech doesn’t exist.

but in reality the internet is the greatest bastion of free speech because you can do and say whatever you want on it.

[STODR]

@CanadianJudo

@STODR

No, did I say you should?

so you agree that censorship is allowed and free speech doesn’t exist.

but in reality the internet is the greatest bastion of free speech because you can do and say whatever you want on it.

What the ■■■■ are you talking about? Free speech is by the government not by private individuals. Go back to school.

[CanadianJudo]

@STODR

@CanadianJudo

@STODR

No, did I say you should?

so you agree that censorship is allowed and free speech doesn’t exist.

but in reality the internet is the greatest bastion of free speech because you can do and say whatever you want on it.

What the ■■■■ are you talking about? Free speech is by the government not by private individuals. Go back to school.

this thread is about censorship on the internet and how its a violation of free speech.

[STODR]

Really none of the bakers went out of business because of the bad press?

[Jezcoe]

@conan

I don’t care what you’re asking. The fact remains the fiber optic are laid on public right aways.

Just like argument that baker is depended on on roadways for his clients and materials.

Can the government regulate the speech of a newspaper just because it uses public roads to deliver the paper?

[STODR]

Yes but government censorship is different then private individual censorship. Like I said go back to school.

[mobulis]

@STODR

@Jezcoe

@STODR

■■■■■■■■ those suits were in large metropolitan areas with numerous bakers. They were not limited in choice. Being that some of them won do to what you actually said, “it was their forum”, as an artist. your hypocrisy is is shining.

State imposed public accommodation laws are not dependent on density.

Maybe they should be… but they aren’t.

Get rid of all public accommodation laws.

It will take a couple of decades for them to be reimposed because people just can’t help being ■■■■■■■■■ but go ahead. Lobby your State government to allow for discriminatory business practices.

But to bring this back to the OP’s complaint, the services that are being complained about are ones that are private and offered for free

So to complain that one can’t use another’s private platform however they wish… for free… is not really a conservative way to deal with things.

That is the problem with you. You agree on one hand but not the other. I am consistent. They should both be allowed. In the case of the baker people should just make it go bankrupt like some did. Government should stay out of it, except in areas of essential need which a cake is not.

Except that they are different.