Is China right concerning censorship?

[CanadianJudo]

@STODR

Really none of the bakers went out of business because of the bad press?

You can’t refuse service based on special class.
no one is being refused access to Twitter because of their special class.

so the comparison is moot.

[Jezcoe]

@STODR

Really none of the bakers went out of business because of the bad press?

Masterpeice bakery is still chugging along

[CanadianJudo]

@Jezcoe

@conan

I don’t care what you’re asking. The fact remains the fiber optic are laid on public right aways.

Just like argument that baker is depended on on roadways for his clients and materials.

Can the government regulate the speech of a newspaper just because it uses public roads to deliver the paper?

even if the internet was ruled a public utility ( which it should)
even if website where not allowed to discriminate based on protected class (PA laws)

Political belief isn’t a protected class so they would still get banned.

[Jezcoe]

@CanadianJudo

@Jezcoe

@conan

I don’t care what you’re asking. The fact remains the fiber optic are laid on public right aways.

Just like argument that baker is depended on on roadways for his clients and materials.

Can the government regulate the speech of a newspaper just because it uses public roads to deliver the paper?

even if the internet was ruled a public utility ( which it should)
even if website where not allowed to discriminate based on protected class (PA laws)

Political belief isn’t a protected class so they would still get banned.

And in the Turley piece it wasn’t even about political belief but about bad medical opinions based on unsound statistical analysis.

[CanadianJudo]

@Jezcoe

@CanadianJudo

@Jezcoe

@conan

I don’t care what you’re asking. The fact remains the fiber optic are laid on public right aways.

Just like argument that baker is depended on on roadways for his clients and materials.

Can the government regulate the speech of a newspaper just because it uses public roads to deliver the paper?

even if the internet was ruled a public utility ( which it should)
even if website where not allowed to discriminate based on protected class (PA laws)

Political belief isn’t a protected class so they would still get banned.

And in the Turley piece it wasn’t even about political belief but about bad medical opinions based on unsound statistical analysis.

now if those medical opinion were based on Jesus we would be stewing.

[WuWei]

@Impenitent

censorship is double plus good

utopia

Wrongspeak has no place in Utopia.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

State imposed public accommodation laws are not dependent on density.

No? That wasn’t one of the original arguments?

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

The internet is a public utility?

Is a cupcake shop?

[WuWei]

@conan

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

Nice.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@STODR

Really none of the bakers went out of business because of the bad press?

Masterpeice bakery is still chugging along

Submit.

[CanadianJudo]

@WuWei

@conan

The fiber optics uses public right aways. Lot of it was subsidized.

Nice.

so is cable, does that mean I can go demand I be allowed TV?

[mobulis]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

The internet is a public utility?

Is a cupcake shop?

Yes it is.

[STODR]

That is kinda the point. Government is making special classes and violating other people’s rights to enforce those classes.

[mobulis]

@STODR

That is kinda the point. Government is making special classes and violating other people’s rights to enforce those classes.

Preventing discrimination is not violating other people’s rights.

[Paul_Thomson]

@Scratch

Well seeing how the Trump campaign just sued a Wisconsin station for running a political tv add he didnt like…I guess your thread is very timely.

Do you see no difference between taking someone to court to have it determined whether they were lying and being recompensed for damages versus using superior power and resources to unilaterally silence someone who’s views one dislikes before proving in court that they are lying?

[tnt]

LOL!

Teh guy you support kicked a reporter out of the VP press pool for posting a picture of the VP…and you care about censorship and the 1st amendment?

Hardy har har har.