Is Biden dishonest or just stupid

[Rurudyne]

Re the OP: who says he can’t be both?

[janer]

Addressing the OP’s topic question: dishonesty and stupidity are not mutually exclusive.

[Guilds]

@conan

But for libs…they’re mostly buying em to be used against their political enemies it seems.

Interesting opinion.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

@Supreme_War_Pig

Insofar as he is buying it because he thinks it’s going to be banned soon, yes.

I will again cite the Obama years, and all the dire gun control predictions that never came true.

Yes but there was an “assault weapons ban” once.

You never know when it can actually happen.

I agree the odds are low…but one can never be too prepared.

That’s what we said in 1993. We naively believed in the Constitution.

[conan]

Have you been reading what your kin are saying?

[Guilds]

@conan

Have you been reading what your kin are saying?

Not sure.
What are you referring to?

FTR, I am not a gun owner…so I do not think they are my kin or kind.

[biggestal99]

@altair1013

“I am calling on Congress to enact commonsense gun law reforms

Calling on common sense gun laws is not banning guns.

A neighbor here in jersey has one. And jersey has common sense gun laws.

Allan

[hindsight]

@Paul_Thomson

@hindsight

And yet Biden won. Elections have consequences.

Big tech, the mainstream media and the deep state won the presidency for Basement Joe. Basement Joe just surfed in on the wake of their undeclared multi-billion dollar campaign contributions.

Trump had nothing to do with losing? Comical.

[conan]

You have those Berkeley libs who said they were preparing for the coming societal collapse…and who do they fear?

It’s not the goverment they fear now is it?

Nearly 30 million back grounds checks were done last year…about 4 out of ten where first time gun buyers.

So why are they buying guns? Who do they fear? Blacks? Conservatives?

Something to chew on.

[Guilds]

Looks like that data is form Jan of this year.

Don’t gun sales always go up, after a Democrat is elected as POTUS, due to the fear of banning guns?

And if that is the case, are those liberals buying guns?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

I understand what you mean, but this court is much more friendly to gun rights. I remain confident in my prediction that gun rights are secure for another generation.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

I understand what you mean, but this court is much more friendly to gun rights. I remain confident in my prediction that gun rights are secure for another generation.

Remains to be seen. Shouldn’t be a question of “friendly to gun rights”.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

Well yes, that is the nature of predictions

[Paul_Thomson]

@hindsight

Trump had nothing to do with losing? Comical.

Your jibe is a non sequitur. That big tech, the MSM and the deep state along with unconstitutional election rule changes by officials outside of legislatures handed Biden the presidency, does not imply that Trump had no effect on the election result. Obviously, had he not stood, he could not have lost.

[DisturbedGuy]

I’m labeled as a lib here. I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment. I’ve shot many firearms and own one myself. However, I do not have an issue with common sense gun reforms. If you are buying a weapon of war, waiting 3 days so a REAL background check can be done is not infringing on your right to bear arms.

[WuWei]

@DisturbedGuy

I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment.

@DisturbedGuy

However, I do not have an issue with common sense gun reforms.

One of these is wrong

@DisturbedGuy

I’ve shot many firearms and own one myself.

Irrelevant.

@DisturbedGuy

If you are buying a weapon of war, waiting 3 days so a REAL background check can be done is not infringing on your right to bear arms.

Incorrect, useless and wrong. The BGC is the same. And actually BGC is not the right term. It’s a criminal history check.

That post is a sheep in wolf’s clothing.

[WuWei]

@DisturbedGuy

weapon of war,

Oh and

[Samm]

@DisturbedGuy

I’m labeled as a lib here. I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment. I’ve shot many firearms and own one myself. However, I do not have an issue with common sense gun reforms. If you are buying a weapon of war, waiting 3 days so a REAL background check can be done is not infringing on your right to bear arms.

You should have been required to wait 3 days and gone through a background check before being allowed to say that. Maybe while you had the time to think about it, you would have realized how stupid it was.

Or maybe, the government would have decided that you shouldn’t be allowed to speak at all.

[DisturbedGuy]

@WuWei

@DisturbedGuy

I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment.

@DisturbedGuy

However, I do not have an issue with common sense gun reforms.

One of these is wrong

@DisturbedGuy

I’ve shot many firearms and own one myself.

Irrelevant.

@DisturbedGuy

If you are buying a weapon of war, waiting 3 days so a REAL background check can be done is not infringing on your right to bear arms.

Incorrect, useless and wrong. The BGC is the same. And actually BGC is not the right term. It’s a criminal history check.

That post is a sheep in wolf’s clothing.

Neither is wrong. There are firearms that require extra scrutiny just because of the damage they are capable of doing.

[DisturbedGuy]

@Samm

@DisturbedGuy

I’m labeled as a lib here. I firmly believe in the 2nd amendment. I’ve shot many firearms and own one myself. However, I do not have an issue with common sense gun reforms. If you are buying a weapon of war, waiting 3 days so a REAL background check can be done is not infringing on your right to bear arms.

You should have been required to wait 3 days and gone through a background check before being allowed to say that. Maybe while you had the time to think about it, you would have realized how stupid it was.

Or maybe, the government would have decided that you shouldn’t be allowed to speak at all.

BS… if you need an automatic rifle to hunt bambi you need a new hobby. You can still walk out with a firearm. Your rights have not been infringed.