Completely wrong. Scrutiny of what?
1 Like
One of these is wrong. The 2nd has nothing to do with hunting.
2 Likes
And the 2nd was written when it took 5 minutes to reload. What’s the point?
1 Like
Again, wrong.
1 Like
Nope…fact.
It never took 5 minutes to reload any arm on this continent.
But hey! It’s irrelevant.
Try 15 seconds tops. Soldiers in about half that.
Granted for the best of the best. That’s not what is in question. We are talking about firearms capable of firing 20 times that.
Irrelevant. 15 seconds was not “best of the best”. It was top end.
Good of you to admit you have no idea what you are talking about.
2 Likes
BS…that is what is in question. Requiring a weapon capable of so much death is not the same as restricting your right to bear arms.
1 Like
Tsk…tsk. prove me wrong. 
I already did.
I think the victims of the Las Vegas shooting think these arguments are ridiculous.
Only in your mind…
5 minutes to reload.
I conceded that the best of the best could do it In under 1 minute. Doesn’t change what the weapons we are discussing are capable of doing.
The best could do it in under 10 seconds. So you’re still wrong.
The weapon isn’t capable of doing anything. It’s not the arrow, it’s the Indian.
2 Likes
Nope…that is fantasy land to defend your position.
1 Like
I ran those guns most of my adult life and as a profession. Better part of 30 years. Trust me when I tell you it isn’t capable of doing anything on it’s own.
You really don’t know anything about this.
2 Likes
