I want to address this in a fully serious way.
I have spent my career in agribusiness in various roles and levels. Early on, I ran a beef slaughterhouse. Over the years, I have seen all aspects of the meat and poultry industry close up, some good, some bad, but in most cases improving.
Two points that must be made.
-
Mankind (nearly 8 Billion individuals) cannot be sufficiently and affordably fed except by an extreme economy of scale.
-
Industry of any kind, food or non-food, does not arise in a vacuum. It arises from an âa prioriâ demand for the product or service in question AND for that product or service at the cheapest possible price.
For example, people want eggs, CHEAP. Suppliers figured out that to get to CHEAP required an extreme industrialization of the process. Battery cages, selective breeding, artificial light, etc. The public who craved those eggs were not concerned with the welfare of the chickens, so neither was industry.
In recent years, the âa prioriâ portion of the equation has changed. Many people still demand cheap abundant eggs without regard for welfare of the chickens, but many other people do demand improvements in welfare. Thus a change has occurred from battery cages to cage free operations in many egg production units, to satisfy public demand and the demands of certain companies, such as McDonaldâs, for cruelty free eggs.
There is a market segment that demands changes beyond that, including free range eggs and pasture raised eggs. And suppliers have arisen to meet those demands. The people demanding these type of eggs recognize they must pay significantly more to support their choice, but are willing to do so.
But as long as a segment of the population demands eggs at the lowest possible price, a segment of industry will support that demand through battery cage operations.
The bottom line, industry does not exist in a vacuum, it is symbiotic with its market. Industry will only change if consumers willingly push such change by voting with their consumption dollars.