In re: Michael Flynn (Writ of Mandamus granted, District Court must immediately dismiss the case with prejudice)

Yet…

the WH is considering bringing him back in some capacity.

1 Like

didn’t the DOJ determine that page and stroky did nothing wrong? that their personal opinions didn’t influence their work?

Did he say there was corrupt intent or not?

Not surprised. Deplorable wrangler?

The appeal has already been filed. Will the DOJ move to dismiss before the appeal is heard?

this is absolutely false.

he said neither.

no, they concluded nothing of the sort. They concluded it was hard to prove.

1 Like

I’m not awfully surprised by this. An en banc motion is sure to follow. Then we see what the full court has to say.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

I think we found some corrupt intent!

what does lyin joe biden have to say?

lyin joe biden, lyin all along.

2 Likes

What corrupt intent does this show?

Politically motivated investigation into the opposing parties personnel. You don’t even need a GED to figure that one out.

Trump tweets ■■■■ and all liberals go nuts. Obama and Biden DID it.

1 Like
1 Like

A politically motivated investigation to find out why Flynn is having so many conversations with Kislyak?

Sounds like a logical thing to do. Just because they rightfully believed that Flynn was doing something wrong does not meet the standard of corrupt intent.

they are not charged with the same crimes. Flynn was charged pursuant to an FBI interview that his business partner was not there for. Your assertion is false.

false again. The FBI had concluded there was nothing wrong with the calls before Biden advised them to keep the investigation open predicating it on the Logan act. Why would the fbi need to further investigate legal and legitimate phone calls?

1 Like

Flynn’s statement of offense includes FARA violations pertaining to Turkey.

1 Like

which he was not charged with. Like 99% of everyone else who fails to register. Don’t worry, we know, it’s only a problem for you if a republican does it.

The fact remains, your statement is false