Of course, the side that needs to lie to make the statue and the history fit their ideology will find it easier to destroy the statue and remove the reminder that spurs a retelling of the truth they struggle to counter with their lies.
You do know that many of the statues were erected to rewrite history according to the Lost Cause myth?
I was being sarcastic. I would have expected people to know that any country that has outlawed certain acts or objects can also have exceptions to their rule.
By the way, this also ignores something I mentioned earlier - despite Germany’s ban on Nazi iconography (disclaimer about the legal exception to the general ban), Germany still manages to remember its history. And some examples do exist… in museums, like the swastika painted on that fighter plane.
There is no more iconic symbol/imagery of the Nazi Army than their uniforms which are displayed in numerous monuments which I have provided you links to.
There is no more iconic symbol/imagery of the Nazi Army than their uniforms which are displayed in numerous monuments which I have provided you links to.
You’re just counting their uniforms as iconography? Despite the fact that the law is about their symbols in particular? Would you have preferred that I have said "Germany has no Nazi symbols|?
The point was that Nazi Germany has not forgotten its history and it’s prior misdeeds despite a dedicated and consisted effort to remove Nazi symbols/iconography/statutes/sculptures/artworks/etc. etc, except in very specific circumstances.
So, the fear that the U.S. will suddenly forget it’s history merely because it does the same with regards to Confederate statues, is unfounded. We have an entire country to compare to.
Likewise, the suggestion that the U.S. will forget its history due to a few statues being removed is dubious, considering that the reason those statues went up is to promote the pseudo-history of the Lost Cause.
There is nothing stopping you explaining to someone the history as you believe it surrounding the person depicted in a statue. You have no way to verify the motive you ascribe to a statue’s being erected in the past. Pulling a statue down because you imagine a disquieting motive for it’s being erected is plain stupid.
Yet we’ve already established that Germany has not white washed it’s history of the Nazi era and hasn’t purged the country of statues and memorials honoring the Germans who died fighting for that cause.
Virtually everything you claimed here as fact has in fact been shown to be completely false.
Now once again.
What is the confederate iconography you are equating to Nazi Iconography in Germany?
A straight answer for a change would be refreshing.
McEnery and Penn having been elected governor and lieutenant-governor by the white people, were duly installed by this overthrow of carpetbag government, ousting the usurpers, Governor Kellogg (white) and Lieutenant-Governor Antoine (colored). United States troops took over the state government and reinstated the usurpers but the national election of November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state.
Yet we’ve already established that Germany has not white washed it’s history of the Nazi era
Except “white wash” implies that Germany has erased all hints of Nazi Germany. It hasn’twhitewashed it’s history, because it acknowledges it without the need to glorify it. So you’ve already changed the terms of the discussion by using a very specific term.
memorials honoring the Germans who died fighting for that cause.
My understanding of German war memories is that they are mourning those who died, not honoring them.