more proof then their stupid opinion.
Nunes is insisting that the guy who reported what appears to be a drunk driver needs to be brought forward to disparage. After the driver blows .26.
A memo.
Claims that are unsubstantiated and unverified.
His boss over-ruled his edits.
Be patient and ready for the counter.
1 Like
No, he isn’t. Nobody puts Eric in a corner.
Why would he overrule the edits?
Nunes’ questioning is worthless. He’s not trying to get facts.
…and what does the alleged edits change?
Good question.
Let the process advance.
Not just questioning his loyalty but also putting him and his family in danger.
https://twitter.com/benpershing/status/1196740476352770049?s=21
Nunes trying to find out who gave information to the WB through process of emlinination
This is also bizzare…As though Biden’s term as VP and his sone Hunter never existed.
WHY would a fair mind jump right to this other than it is the only way to dramatize it?
Goldman: “You said it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the political benefits of [President Trump’s] demands explain?”
Vindman: “To investigate a political opponent was inappropriate and improper. I made that connection as soon as [President Trump] brought up the Biden investigation.”
Sad and disgusting.
This is the same tactic as playing up the Ambassadresses history.
It means NOTHING to the impeachment matter.
It does point to an emotional issue.
It points to MAGAs threatening this decorated veteran’s life in danger…disgusting and un-American.
A bias against unconstitutional abuse of power, oh the horror.
.
.
.
.WW
3 Likes
This is completely illogical.
His testimony isn’t worth even yelling at the TV over.
A matter of opinion…as it has been and will continue to be.
Where can i see a complete transcript? They just testified that they were on the call and the transcript has some key omissions.
Yep. Hopefully fat donald will follow their advice. 
https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1196752478513090562?s=21
1 Like
