That’s because they know it will go no where in the senate. They’re not going to do stupid like the R’s did with Clinton and like some posters here keep pushing them to do.
You wouldn’t know rule of law if bit you in the ass.
And that is key.
But for Trump’s transparency, we would not have known about the 10 supposed obstruction items. Trump’s unprecedented transparency certainly doesn’t look to me like he was obstructing anything. Actually quite the opposite.
1 Like
I laughed so hard I thought it was a spoof post.
What law nazi germany law or socialist law, trump has done nothing wrong .Did you see something on the mueller report that the rest of us didnt, and everyone that says he should be impeached is a true hipocrit who has no idea that the constitution is what made this country as the greatest place in the world to live period.Please quit listening to what others who have so much hatred in their hearts and minds , and read find out the truth before making any judgements. UnitedStates ofAMERICA,is my home and we the people need to be as one. God Bless all
I agree with that.
Courage of conviction. Put him in the history books as a lesson learned.
That’s not Rule of Law.
Yes it is.
I see. So you can make whatever accusation you want without having to back it up…is that the intent?
1 Like
What are you talking about.
It absolutely is not.
Well, that’s your opinion.
No, it’s in the definition of Rule of Law.
It’s a theoretical definition.
And as usual the devil is in the details.
So you believe Trump provided obstructed access to material and executive branch employees?? Please provide some supporting information, demonstrating where Trump prevented Mueller access from anything. Case in point is McGahn. His interviews were embarrassing to the President to say the least. He did those interviews with the blessing of Trump. If you believe that wasn’t the case, please point to your supporting material demonstrating that McGahn was forced and where Trump invoked executive privilege in an attempt to stop McGahn - or anyone else for that matter.
If you want to know what real obstruction of justice looks like, look no further than Hillary’s private server, here deleted e-mails following a subpoena and her bleach bit’d hard drive. Now that is some serious obstruction.
1 Like
Impeach him for what?
There was no Trump-Russia collusion- none. In fact there was never any collusion by any American or Russian. The entire premise of the counter-intel investigation was a fraud, and the Mueller investigation was a freaking travesty to our criminal justice system. So what they hell crimes worthy of impeachment do you think Trump committed?
I find it curious, although I know the reasons why. The Dems everywhere shrugged their shoulders and said “let’s move on,” after Hilary’s crimes were cited, by Comey. He declared no DOJ attorney would bother to prosecute her for her crimes. Today, the Dems want to prosecute Trump, even when he committed no crimes, and none have been cited against Trump.
So, to recap:
Hilary - multiple crimes were cited which she committed, but the Obama DOJ said they wouldn’t prosecute her. The Dems say that’s the end of that, and the book is closed. Then the dems proceed to vote for Hilary for president.
Trump - there was absolutely no Russian collusion with any American, much less Trump, DOJ says no crimes were found - and yet Dems want to impeach and throw Trump in prison
Conclusion - Democrats are either dishonest political party hacks, or they’re insane and out of touch with reality
1 Like
And no one is going to be impressed by people running around saying someone is guilty but the system wont do anything about it. Were you impressed by “Lock her up”?
2 Likes
No. The Rule of Law means the law rules, not “we only prosecute cases we can win.”
