Can’t tell them that if it was easy to catch or discover, it would not happen at all. Catching 2 instances, actually their other cases, highlights just how hard it is to catch, especially if it occurs by insiders. The only way to learn the truth, or get close to the truth, is to go door to door. But even that may not give you an accurate picture. But its really funny the denial coming from the very camp that believes the manufacturers of the electronic voting machines rig the machines in advance.
Isn’t it amazing how despite having it explained to you directly, repeatedly, that there have long been SYSTEMS in place to prevent votes being cast (or such votes counted) by persons not eligible to vote, you remain blithely ignorant? How do you do it?
By “you’re not a sheeple” you mean you pull it out of your ass. I.e., you make it up out of whole cloth, ignore the factual evidence, then claim superior knowledge. That’s a neat party trick.
Instead of the you-think-clever drivel, you could try explaining why you keep repeating the lie that California driver’s license applicants are automatically registered to vote.
This is from Snopes;
The law requires that applicants under the Motor Voter Act attest that they meet all voter registration requirements, but critics maintain that the law “lacks the necessary safeguards to keep noncitizens off the voter rolls.” Although those critics fear that undocumented residents may slip through the loopholes and becomes registered to vote, it’s not accurate to say that California has made it “legal” for undocumented residents to vote.
Potential voters “have to demonstrate proof of age, the vast majority of time people are showing a birth certificate or a passport, which also reflects citizenship. That’s arguably more secure than someone checking a box under penalty of perjury,” Padilla said.
Why not make that a requirement? If it’s the “vast majority”, that means that it isn’t always…thus…what I said is accurate.