If Trump is UNJUSTLY removed from office

[Smyrna]

@adroit

Perhaps with a couple of chalk boards you can enlighten me.

You’re of the age to be well past the level of discretion you’re applying.

[Blackwolf]

@BlueTex

You make a great point… Why is the Trump administration such cowards? Where are those indictments? I mean a couple of weeks ago the pending McCabe indictment was all the talk… Where is it?

According to our very well placed sources here, it all goes down in 2020. The end of the Democrat party and the Deep State Russia Collusion Hoax traitor criminal cabal!

[Smyrna]

@BlueTex

You make a great point… Why is the Trump administration such cowards? Where are those indictments? I mean a couple of weeks ago the pending McCabe indictment was all the talk… Where is it?

My conclusion is that when there is actually a crime of substance and those that would be defendants are way up the food chain, that all T’s must be crossed and all I’s dotted before the charges are laid out. The person that is heading up this effort is Barr and he has appointed Durham just a few months ago. IMO…the wheels of justice are turning but at a very slow rate due to all the forces at work, against their efforts.

[Ex-Pat]

Then America would have truly lost its mind. Kind of like Trump has.

But it is certainly possible that Trump resigns especially if he knows he’s going to lose next year. The Mooch has predicted as much.

[Konssurvative1]

@LouC

OK

How do you think Obese Donald might “unjustly” be removed form office?’

Should the House submit Articles of Impeachment to the Senate and he is then tried on those Articles and found guilty and convicted in the US Senate and removed from office that will be the second most just removal from office only second to just removal at the Polls denying him a second term of office.

Why have elections?

Because elections for the office of the Presidency is how our Founding Fathers determined our top leader would be determined.

Along with how presidents would be determined our Founding Fathers also gave us a way to remove a president before a new election, if need arise and he/she is legitimately convicted at trial in the Senate.

Any such conviction will be a BIPARTISAN conviction as it is totally impossible for the Democrats to effect alone any conviction in the Senate,

Dearest Patrick, should Obese Donald be removed from office upon a conviction at trial in the Senate that will be as far and removed from how the Chinese Communist Party in China operates as could possibly be. The President of China is in office for life, the only way they have to remove hi is revolution.

Conviction in the Senate and that method of removal would be the SECOND most JUST means by which Obese Donald could be removed from office.

That would be a sign, ultimate proof, that our Republic system of rule, created by our Founders, had worked exactly as they hoped. Showing once and for all that no citizen, even a president, is ABOVE the LAW.

I would prefer Obese Donald be removed in a landslide of rejection at the Polls come November 3rd, 2020. However if Articles of Impeachment are sent to the Senate and at trial on those Articles he is convicted and removed, well that will also be okay, because I would at least know he was legitimately removed.

The single most logical post seen in days. In essence, if guilty and removed president would have to be removed by a large number of Republican Senators. So it would not be all on Democrats.

[Konssurvative1]

Because they think democrats can install Hillary as President. It’s their greatest fear.

[wonderingrover]

@Konssurvative1

Because they think democrats can install Hillary as President. It’s their greatest fear.

That is a sad indictment on the public’s knowledge of civics and how our government functions. I think there needs to be more education about exactly how our government works. Better to argue things like this as a well - informed debater than just a low information debater.

[Camp]

They HAVE TO.

They have thrown in the towel on the 2020 election.

They KNOW Trump wins…unless…

[Camp]

What is sad is the media presentation of the process and how biased they have become.

It is much tougher to resolve the truth for young people…as their freedoms get rolled back one background check and hurtful word at a time.

[Kelby]

@Patrick

By hook or crook, get Trump!

Now you’re getting it.

[BlueTex]

@Smyrna

My conclusion is that when there is actually a crime of substance and those that would be defendants are way up the food chain, that all T’s must be crossed and all I’s dotted before the charges are laid out. The person that is heading up this effort is Barr and he has appointed Durham just a few months ago. IMO…the wheels of justice are turning but at a very slow rate due to all the forces at work, against their efforts.

So they are just not as competent as the Mueller team? Maybe Trump should fire Barr and hire Mueller as AG…

[Kelby]

@wonderingrover

@Konssurvative1

Because they think democrats can install Hillary as President. It’s their greatest fear.

That is a sad indictment on the public’s knowledge of civics and how our government functions. I think there needs to be more education about exactly how our government works. Better to argue things like this as a well - informed debater than just a low information debater.

A misinformed Trump supporter?

You don’t say?

[Smyrna]

@BlueTex

So they are just not as competent as the Mueller team?

They aren’t one-sided like the Mueller team was. They are looking at everything…equally…to apply prosecution/justice the same way.

[BlueTex]

@Smyrna

They aren’t one-sided like the Mueller team was. They are looking at everything…equally…to apply prosecution/justice the same way.

What the heck does that mean? If they have evidence of a crime, present it to a grand jury. The GRAND JURY decides on indictment, not the AG’s office… Where is McCabe’s indictment?

[Smyrna]

@BlueTex

What the heck does that mean? If they have evidence of a crime, present it to a grand jury. The GRAND JURY decides on indictment, not the AG’s office… Where is McCabe’s indictment?

In a 50/50 chance…how many lawyers that Mueller chose were Rs?

[wonderingrover]

@Camp

What is sad is the media presentation of the process and how biased they have become.

It is much tougher to resolve the truth for young people…as their freedoms get rolled back one background check and hurtful word at a time.

I learned (in a public school) that news programs often tended to insert their personal bias in 3rd grade in the 70’s. There has to be personal responsibility to research information you hear from any source and make your own decisions. That is a part of the whole education process - by the time you get to be an adult, you should have that mastered.

[BlueTex]

@Smyrna

In a 50/50 chance…how many lawyers that Mueller chose were Rs?

Are we now going to have political test for lawyers? Geez… present the evidence… Where is the McCabe indictment?

[Smyrna]

@BlueTex

Are we now going to have political test for lawyers? Geez… present the evidence… Where is the McCabe indictment?

Spanky, spanky…now go to your room.

[ohknow35]

@Blackwolf

According to our very well placed sources here, it all goes down in 2020. The end of the Democrat party and the Deep State Russia Collusion Hoax traitor criminal cabal!

Kind of schiffesque, but I still like it.

^*

[ohknow35]

@wonderingrover

That is a sad indictment on the public’s knowledge of civics and how our government functions. I think there needs to be more education about exactly how our government works. Better to argue things like this as a well - informed debater than just a low information debater.

Several hillary supporters suggested just such a scenario.

The washington post floated the idea of president pelosi just the other day.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/30/president-pelosi-it-could-happen/

Neither of is gonna happen.

^*