BLM is not a failure.
Now Antifa? That is a failure.
BLM is a cult, a financial conduit for Democrat candidates and the enrichment of whatever âleadershipâ BLM has. Whites who identify themselves as âalliesâ and those who contribute are nothing more than suckers for a cheap street hustle.
Still not convinced? Go to their website and or listen to prominent Black journalists, celebrities and athletes who denounce BLM. Or, research the BLM involvement in the murder rates of Blacks in Chicago, NY, Baltimore Louisville St. Louis and many other US cities? Oh wait, there is none.
2 Likes
Iâll check the movie out. As for Antifa? Yep!
1 Like
Itâs really good. After you watch it, please come back and tell us what you think.
I know this is a post on Jul 17 but i am pretty sure it would maybe the reason there are more BLM signs then Trump signs is problary because its just dangerous to come out publicly that you support Trump or any other republicans?
Extortion, mafia tactics? Why am I not surprised? 
The release states that La Bodeguita de Mima was forced to close July 24 during a demonstration that shut down East Market Street, at which several protesters presented Martinez with the list of demands and said he âbetter put the letter on the door so your business is not â â â â â â with.â
The demands and an attached contract, which were created by local organizers and activists, ask NuLu business owners to:
Adequately represent the Black population of Louisville by having a minimum of 23% Black staff;
Purchase a minimum of 23% inventory from Black retailers or make a recurring monthly donation of 1.5% of net sales to a local Black nonprofit or organization;
Require diversity and inclusion training for all staff members on a bi-annual basis;
And display a visible sign that increases awareness and shows support for the reparations movement.
It is not dangerous to publicly support Donald Trumpâs re-election in rural Maine.
The mob can take their âlist of demandsâ to legitimate business owners and stick it where the sun donât shine.
These are organized crime tactics. I would think the US Justice Dept would initiate an investigation under the RICO Act.
Try doing a little more research and giving it more thought. So in other words, systemic racism. What your saying is systemic racism increased exponentially from 1960 to today. Not buying that theory. Also it doesnât explain the exponential increase in single parent households for white children. Another thing, from my own experience growing up in an inner city, teaching in an inner city school, knowing other teachers who also taught at inner city schools and in GED programs (most of those students are single mothers who dropped out of school), and knowing people who are landlords. To sum up that experience, most of the women are very young and openly admit that having babies "gets them free stuffâ as they put it, or there are those who have multiple children âto get a bigger houseâ. Iâll choose to believe them over you. Here are some other interesting observations:
âTo provide some historical context, the out-of-wedlock birth rate in the black community was already rising before the Great Society. In 1938, that rate stood at 11 percent. Still, itâs worth noting the difference between the slow and steady increase of 1938 to 1965, and the explosive growth from 1965 until the present day. In any event, black women were more likely to be married than white women as late as 1950. Itâs also worth looking at single parenthood over time: In the 1950s, 52 percent of all black children lived with both parents until the age of 17. By the 1980s, that number had plummeted to 6 percent.â
A friend of mine who taught in Newark schools had a 19 year old female student who was having a third child. He asked her why and she told him that would get her a bigger house.
Not here in the Bay Area.
Only time I started school with prayer was First Grade at Bethel Christian Academy back in 1960.
Never in secular schools I attended.
Youâll note that of course he never came back with any straight answers.
Because itâs â â â â â â â â â What he essentially is claiming is that there was a concerted effort in the mid to late 1960âs from the systemic racist system to arbitrarily incarcerate as many black men as possible so that young black children would grow up without fathers. Why the systemic racist system waited until the mid 1960âs though is beyond understanding.
No Iâm not.
Iâm saying the way in which Systemic racism is delivered changed. Went from Jim Crow to War or Drugs and mass incarceration.
And how does that explain the exponential rise in the number of white children during the same period? Furthermore, I grew up in predominantly black and Hispanic inner city during the 1970âs. None of the black or Latino fathers in my neighborhood were taken away by the police.
At the insistence of âBlack Leadersâ who were tired of the Black Community being destroyed by them.
The law applies equally to people of all races so there can be no claim of âsystemic racismâ. Not an honest claim at least.
Thank you. That was so informative.
It made my head spin reading that mess.
Mess?
Systemic racism has taken on different forms.
The movement towards the Welfare State is one example.
Black Women can only receive certain benefits (welfare, housing,etc.) If the father of their child(ren) is not in the home. So Black Women are encouraged to leave the fathers. Family was once promoted as the norm in Black America. Now singlehood is being promoted. Black Women are taught âthey donât need a man.â
We all know that redlining was a way to keep Black People out of the housing market, I donât think that can be disputed at this point. How many years did that last, and how much Black Wealth was stifled as a result?
From about the 1950s until the 70s, 80s, maybe even 90s - Black Communities, towns, cities were sysyematically destroyed through a sort of imminent domain. Highway Systems were intentionally constructed THROUGH Black Communities, displacing the residents. Racist land developers knew they could make a lot of money while displacing Black People, so they worked EITH THE GOVERNMENT to mske it happen. These displaced people would be the same people seeking loans to purchase homes in other communities.
From the 1950s to the 2000s the FBI (and other agencies) disrupted Black Organizations, and murdered leaders like Dr. King, Malcolm X, Medgar Evers, Fred Hampton, and before that Marcus Garvey. This was out of fear of a âBlack Messiah.â All this evidence came out through COINTELPRO.
To tjis day the FBI has a BLACK DESK to keep tabs on Black Organizatiins, Leadees, Artists, etc.
The same people who committed lynchings from 1865 until AT LEAST 1965 were also police, judges, property managers, real estate developers, etc. These are the people who were the gatekeepers to Black Progress by default. The type of people who were lynched were entrepreneurs, educators, community leaders, people with skills, talent, and money. The murders were not as random as might appear.
Through the 90s and much of the 2000s a progressive city like NYC had an unconstitutional practice called Stop And Frisk, where police were permitted to harass (mostly Black and Latino) men and women, and search through their possessions with NO probable cause.
These are just a few examples of Systemic Racism, and ways it has manifested over the last 155 years or so. And those are just SOME examples. Those do not include the humsn experimentation (Tuskeegee Experiments, Lyleâs Station Radiation Experiments), or mass incarceration, spearheaded during Clintonâs Presidency, OR the guns/drugs that the government has brought and sold in the Black Community over the past few decades.
Iâd like to see some valid evidence of this please.
