I’m still waiting for you to explain, how are federal mail-in ballots checked when counted, to confirm the one who filled out the ballot and made the choices thereon is the authorized applicant of that ballot.
Is that you, Jezcoe, confirming, there is no way, when counting federal election results, to confirm the one who filled out a mail-in ballot and made the choices thereon, is the authorized applicant of that ballot?
You cannot get a voter card until the little old ladies at the local election board cross-reference your voter reg form (now required to have your SSN since 2006) with the federal SSN database and the state DMV database, as well as state and municipal voting records going back like a century.
I’m not sure what else you want. It’s not even like we have citizenship papers that we carry or even have at all except a Social Security card.
So, you cannot provide an explanation as to how, when counting mail-in ballots, that the one who filled out the ballot and made the choices thereon is the authorized applicant of that ballot.
Not sure about your state, but Ohio only has one mail-in/absentee ballot, we do not have a “federal ballot” and “state ballot”. And as I said previously you have to either write the last 4 of your SSN or your DL#. To get an Ohio DL you have to provide proof of citizenship or legal residence.
Database cross-referencing does not confirm, when counting mail-in ballots, that the one who filled out the ballot and made the choices thereon is the authorized applicant of that ballot.
You didn’t answer my question. Do you agree there is no way, when counting federal election results, to confirm the one who filled out a mail-in ballot and made the choices thereon, is the authorized applicant of that ballot?
Here are the requirements to Register to vote in CA
Qualifications to Register to Vote
“To register to vote in California, you must be:
A United States citizen and a resident of California (for information on voters in the military or overseas, please see Military and Overseas Voters),
18 years old or older on Election Day,
Not currently serving a state or federal prison term for the conviction of a felony (for more information, please see Voting Rights Restored: Persons with a Prior Felony Conviction), and
Not currently found mentally incompetent to vote by a court (for more information, please see Voting Rights: Persons Subject to Conservatorship).”
Thank you for your frankness and agreeing, when counting federal election results, there is no way to confirm the one who filled out a mail-in ballot and made the choices thereon, is the authorized applicant of that ballot
Now, why do you move to the extreme and advocate to eliminate all mail in ballots, when there is in fact a legitimate need for mail-in ballots in rare cases?
For example, mail-in ballots ought to be available to those who may be absent from their voting district because their duties or occupation, and to those who are unable to visit their proper polling place because of illness or physical disability.
Why do you tout “No mail in ballots… no excuses”? Is that your petulant way to dismiss the need to end no-excuse mail in ballots which now invites significant voter fraud?