Does the report come with indictments as attachments? I’m curious how this all works from a legal standpoint.
It’s already leaked.
That is a guess about information from the IG report. At least link to something from the Criminal investigation.
What evidence do you have that more than one person is under criminal investigation? Source?
The IG report will only have recommendations. That is what is due 9 Dec.
I don’t just like you have none that only one is. You certainly don’t have any info from the Durham investigation like you said.
I don’t just like you have none that only one is. You certainly don’t have any info from the Durham investigation like you said.
Awww… The widely reported criminal investigation of one lawyer is far more evidence than your claim of others being investigated…
Does the report come with indictments as attachments? I’m curious how this all works from a legal standpoint.
Again, I have no special relationship with the A.G. Just like you, I’m going to have to wait until Dec. 9. And I don’t mind the wait. It will be perfect timing. Congress will be taking another well earned vacation.
Ok then provide proof only one person is being investigated by Durham? Just use one source where it says just one!
I never claimed any amount now prove your claim.
Adam: gooddad409: Adam: altair1013: Adam:Maybe because he tried to frame a President?
Really? Evidence of this?
You’re asking the wrong man. Are you patient? Can you wait until next month? I’m guessing that’s when the evidence will be presented. Fair enough?
I’m fine waiting because I’ve seen no evidence that he tried to frame a president. You said that, so I was wondering what you’ve seen to make you come to that conclusion.
What do you think the back up plan was?
I don’t know. Need context. What’s the context?
It’s all been laid out many times forever. You are turning a blind eye.
Interesting. I’ve seen your posts in the impeachment thread. It’s almost like your threshold for accepting evidence is different over there.
PAmoderate37: JayJay:I’ve given up trying to guess what’s the latest CEC take on what “the back up plan was”.
Can you enlighten?
So the same people who translate “backup plan” to mean framing of a President, have no problem with “I would like you to do us a favor”.
Trump was going off about Crowdstrike today…he still thinks “the server” is in the Ukraine.
And he called the owner of Crowdstrike a wealthy Ukrainian.
Dmitri Alperovitch was born in Moscow and came here as a small child.
The stuff that Trump says and no one ever calls him on it…
No wonder so many conspiracy theories are so uncritically believed.
Ignorance is bliss. At all levels.
PAmoderate37: JayJay:I’ve given up trying to guess what’s the latest CEC take on what “the back up plan was”.
Can you enlighten?
So the same people who translate “backup plan” to mean framing of a President, have no problem with “I would like you to do us a favor”.
Trump was going off about Crowdstrike today…he still thinks “the server” is in the Ukraine.
And he called the owner of Crowdstrike a wealthy Ukrainian.
Dmitri Alperovitch was born in Moscow and came here as a small child.
The stuff that Trump says and no one ever calls him on it…
No wonder so many conspiracy theories are so uncritically believed.
It’s direct Russian propaganda.
Interesting. I’ve seen your posts in the impeachment thread. It’s almost like your threshold for accepting evidence is different over there.
Does it matter? Should anyone here care how you judge them? If so, why?
Ignorance is bliss. At all levels.
Hopefully there will be less ignorance December 9th. Right?
I have no information showing those things apply to Strzok. I do have ample evidence of Trump doing all of those things. And that’s a non sequitur.
You don’t know Strzok was cheating on his wife by diddling the office help?
You don’t know he lied?
Adam:I have no information showing those things apply to Strzok. I do have ample evidence of Trump doing all of those things. And that’s a non sequitur.
You don’t know Strzok was cheating on his wife by diddling the office help?
You don’t know he lied?
These things are disqualifications for government service now?
435 pages of bias within FBI but bias didn’t effected their decision…yeah I call BS.
That’s why I don’t trust Horowitz or the FBI.
My bet is you’re going to be disappointed…but will continue to be strung along waiting for that “next shoe to drop”.
Horowitz’ report reportedly is going to list these happenings, but will still state that the FBI’s overall case for starting the probe was sound.
My guess is many Trump supporters will either ignore that or descry it as Deep State CYA and harp on stories like what are being posted here.
And then I’m sure there’ll be ANOTHER investigation or at least calls for it.
Because belief in THE DEEP STATE is too firmly embedded to let go of now
After the last report and testimony Horrowitz provided, it was obvious that he’s a master politician in his ability to walk a line…balancing himself perfectly between Ds and Rs. Since he can’t indict either, it’s Huber and Durham that will provide the evidence…if any…that will corroborate my assertions from 2016.
No…nor can they interview outside of department or fired personal.
Deepstate traitors bad!
Yes, then they’ll hang their hopes on the next report coming out and tell us how THAT one will blow this lid off the deep state and that heads will roll, and Obama and Hillary will go to jail. And then when that one falls flat, it will continue.
This is how conspiracy theorists think. There’s always another rabbit hole.