Horowitz reportedly finds FBI lawyer falsified FISA doc; WaPo stealth-deletes Strzok connection

[Eclipze]

Well this is embarrassing.

[gooddad409]

@Adam

@altair1013

@Adam

Maybe because he tried to frame a President?

Really? Evidence of this?

You’re asking the wrong man. Are you patient? Can you wait until next month? I’m guessing that’s when the evidence will be presented. Fair enough?

I’m fine waiting because I’ve seen no evidence that he tried to frame a president. You said that, so I was wondering what you’ve seen to make you come to that conclusion.

What do you think the back up plan was?

[JayJay]

@gooddad409

@Adam

@altair1013

@Adam

Maybe because he tried to frame a President?

Really? Evidence of this?

You’re asking the wrong man. Are you patient? Can you wait until next month? I’m guessing that’s when the evidence will be presented. Fair enough?

I’m fine waiting because I’ve seen no evidence that he tried to frame a president. You said that, so I was wondering what you’ve seen to make you come to that conclusion.

What do you think the back up plan was?

I’ve given up trying to guess what’s the latest CEC take on what “the back up plan was”.

Can you enlighten?

[Adam]

@gooddad409

@Adam

@altair1013

@Adam

Maybe because he tried to frame a President?

Really? Evidence of this?

You’re asking the wrong man. Are you patient? Can you wait until next month? I’m guessing that’s when the evidence will be presented. Fair enough?

I’m fine waiting because I’ve seen no evidence that he tried to frame a president. You said that, so I was wondering what you’ve seen to make you come to that conclusion.

What do you think the back up plan was?

I don’t know. Need context. What’s the context?

[PAmoderate37]

@JayJay

I’ve given up trying to guess what’s the latest CEC take on what “the back up plan was”.

Can you enlighten?

So the same people who translate “backup plan” to mean framing of a President, have no problem with “I would like you to do us a favor”.

[altair1013]

@Adam

I don’t know. Need context. What’s the context?

You’re not going to get that answered today in this forum. Hopefully all of your questions will be answered when the prosecution presents it’s evidence. I’m guessing that he lied to the FISA court and the justice department can prove it. But I’m willing to wait. Are you?

[Guntsu]

As long as we dont have to wait till July 4th I’m cool with it…

[altair1013]

@PAmoderate37

So the same people who translate “backup plan” to mean framing of a President, have no problem with “I would like you to do us a favor”.

Those “same people” you are talking about will have no impact on this case. It’s all about the evidence. Trump voters will not be on trial here. Sorry about your luck.

[BlueTex]

@altair1013

You’re not going to get that answered today in this forum. Hopefully all of your questions will be answered when the prosecution presents it’s evidence. I’m guessing that he lied to the FISA court and the justice department can prove it. But I’m willing to wait. Are you?

Who will be prosecuted?

[Adam]

@altair1013

@Adam

I don’t know. Need context. What’s the context?

You’re not going to get that answered today in this forum. Hopefully all of your questions will be answered when the prosecution presents it’s evidence. I’m guessing that he lied to the FISA court and the justice department can prove it. But I’m willing to wait. Are you?

I’m fine waiting. I’m just curious what people are basing their guilty verdicts on already.

[JayJay]

@PAmoderate37

@JayJay

I’ve given up trying to guess what’s the latest CEC take on what “the back up plan was”.

Can you enlighten?

So the same people who translate “backup plan” to mean framing of a President, have no problem with “I would like you to do us a favor”.

Trump was going off about Crowdstrike today…he still thinks “the server” is in the Ukraine.

And he called the owner of Crowdstrike a wealthy Ukrainian.

Dmitri Alperovitch was born in Moscow and came here as a small child.

The stuff that Trump says and no one ever calls him on it…

No wonder so many conspiracy theories are so uncritically believed.

[PAmoderate37]

@altair1013

Those “same people” you are talking about will have no impact on this case. It’s all about the evidence. Trump voters will not be on trial here. Sorry about your luck.

Not talking about Trump voters, talking about the lap dogs in the AG’s office. Hell I voted for Trump because I knew Hillary was corrupt, but now I know Trump is corrupt.

[altair1013]

@BlueTex

Who will be prosecuted?

How the hell would I know? Maybe 20 people? Maybe nobody? Maybe we’ll find out in two weeks? Lucky for you, congress will be taking yet another of their many vacations at this time. So CNN might actually cover the story? I guess we’ll find out together. I can wait.

[gooddad409]

@Adam

@gooddad409

@Adam

@altair1013

@Adam

Maybe because he tried to frame a President?

Really? Evidence of this?

You’re asking the wrong man. Are you patient? Can you wait until next month? I’m guessing that’s when the evidence will be presented. Fair enough?

I’m fine waiting because I’ve seen no evidence that he tried to frame a president. You said that, so I was wondering what you’ve seen to make you come to that conclusion.

What do you think the back up plan was?

I don’t know. Need context. What’s the context?

It’s all been laid out many times forever. You are turning a blind eye.

[BlueTex]

@altair1013

How the hell would I know? Maybe 20 people? Maybe nobody? Maybe we’ll find out in two weeks? Lucky for you, congress will be taking yet another of their many vacations at this time. So CNN might actually cover the story? I guess we’ll find out together. I can wait.

There is only one lawyer under criminal investigation by Durham by all reports. Same reports are saying Horowitz didn’t find the FISA warrants to be improper. When will we see these new indictments? Two weeks? A month?

I guess we can see why the president wanted a public announcement of an investigation of the Biden’s.

[STODR]

@BlueTex

@altair1013

How the hell would I know? Maybe 20 people? Maybe nobody? Maybe we’ll find out in two weeks? Lucky for you, congress will be taking yet another of their many vacations at this time. So CNN might actually cover the story? I guess we’ll find out together. I can wait.

There is only one lawyer under criminal investigation by Durham by all reports. Same reports are saying Horowitz didn’t find the FISA warrants to be improper. When will we see these new indictments? Two weeks? A month?

Source?

[BlueTex]

@STODR

Source?

Exclusive: Former FBI lawyer under investigation after allegedly altering...

[altair1013]

@STODR

There is only one lawyer under criminal investigation by Durham by all reports. Same reports are saying Horowitz didn’t find the FISA warrants to be improper. When will we see these new indictments? Two weeks? A month?

Be patient. You probably won’t get as many leaks with Barr in charge. The report comes out December 9th.

[STODR]

That is a guess about information from the IG report. At least link to something from the Criminal investigation.

[JayJay]

@PAmoderate37

@altair1013

Those “same people” you are talking about will have no impact on this case. It’s all about the evidence. Trump voters will not be on trial here. Sorry about your luck.

Not talking about Trump voters, talking about the lap dogs in the AG’s office. Hell I voted for Trump because I knew Hillary was corrupt, but now I know Trump is corrupt.

Not sure how you didn’t know he was corrupt before voting for him.