Trump is the one threatening to have “armed guards” at polling places. What an indictment of his term as president that the USA has slipped from a first world country to a country that potentially is adopting the playbook of dictators in intimidating its citizens voting.
If that’s an indictment of his term…my gosh…then according to your logic, all of the Democrat cities that have been burned, looted, pillaged and the home to horrific violence is an indictment of this entire political party…amirite?
Democrats have openly floated ideas for bogging down the election in legal disputes that result in Nancy Pelosi becoming president on January 20. That would depend on Democrats keeping control of the House in January 3.
Please sir - this thread is about Clinton. If you want to talk about Trump squealing about rigged elections and fraud with every breath, start your own thread.
Best case scenario’s far exceed the 270 you assert.
For example, this poll has Trump winning again, this time with a resounding 362 electoral votes.
This same group also gives Trump a 91% chance of success this November.
And noteworthy is them being correct in 25 of the last 27 general elections including 2016.
Unlike many other projections, Norpoth’s equation ignores approval ratings.
“That’s a poll number,” he said, “and I don’t use those. I think the primary performance of a sitting president is usually a proxy for that. But I don’t use any polling data or data related to opinions.”
IMO to use that as a predictor though doesn’t make too much sense. Biden was in a really crowded field and NH wasn’t a significant part of his primary strategy.
To me it seems like a stretch to make predictions based on things like early primary results.
Jeez, what does it take to change rules in this country when the wealthy elite are not for it? It’s been four ■■■■■■■ years and they still can’t use it.