He asked his team to work with that government. Perfectly legal.
What he did was lawful and despite the dirty politics of the left, he was exonerated.
Admits to what? Following the official foreign policy of the US?
Yes⊠and now we live in a world where the President can use funds allocated by Congress to pressure a foreign government to publicly open an investigation on a potential political opponent.
Yay?
Oh come on, seriously? Go watch the video. I get that being a Democrat mandates that you try to spin things in his favor but it doesnât require blatant ignorance.
He admitted to what they were accusing Trump of doing.
If itâs corruption that person admitted to? Youâre damn right I want the President doing that.
Biden was following the official foreign policy of the United States.
Was he going rogue on this one?
Following the official foreign policy of the US is not a corrupt act.
Biden had a full green light to do what he did to threaten to withhold loan guarantees.
Is the argument that he was acting against the will of President Obama?
He asked his PERSONAL lawyer.
The check exist, you know that right? His personal lawyer at the time, plead under oath, that the payment was to Stormy to shut her up⊠right?
These are all things that happened
Itâs our official policy to get a prosecutor fired thatâs investigating a company that his son works for and to hold up aid if they donât comply? Yeah, Iâm kind of thinking thatâs BS.
CAMPAIGN FUNDS. Using personal funds to settle something isnât illegal.
And? Show me where thatâs illegal. Give me a law.
The argument is that he was protecting his son from prosecution by using his official position. That IS a crime.
You said he asked the government. He didnât. That was my point.
Clinton is a sow groundhog?
anon91495210:
Show the proof that he paid her with âcampaign fundsâ.
The check exist, you know that right? His personal lawyer at the time, plead under oath, that the payment was to Stormy to shut her up⊠right?
These are all things that happened
Emphasis mine.
Itâs our official policy to get a prosecutor fired thatâs investigating a company that his son works for and to hold up aid if they donât comply? Yeah, Iâm kind of thinking thatâs BS.
Shokin wasnât actively investigating corruption.
That was the problem.
He asked the government of the Ukraine to look into it. That was the entire crux of the witch hunt.
The argument is that he was protecting his son from prosecution by using his official position. That IS a crime.
Good thing that wasnât what happened.