Grand Jury material temporary blocked by Supreme court

Politics
82

Using campaign funds to pay off a porn star right before an election? Sounds like a problem

Using the power of the government to intimidate and foreign power to do personal services? Sounds like a problem

83

Only to TDS victims.

84

True Truth

It needs to be called “The Strzok Tales”

1 Like
85

#1. Didn’t happen. No one’s proven that it did.
#2. So you agree, Biden needs to be in prison with his admission.

86

Yes… it is 100% obstruction to issue threats to someone who is complying with an investigation against you.

1 Like
87

Impeach him for it.

88

#1. That’s not a threat to anyone with an ounce of common sense that has listened to Trump’s tweets over the years.
#2. What CRIME was he accused of?

89

They don’t care.

The fiction about the corruption of the Obama administration has allowed the actual corruption of the Trump administration to be excused.

1 Like
90

There is an ongoing impeachment inquiry.

This has to do with his obstruction.

“What crime has he been charged with” is a groundhog day question.

91

No, they care. In one case, there was actual corruption. On the other, there was none. I’m sorry, asking a government to investigate potential corruption when you’re about to release aid to that country isn’t a crime. Never has been until the corrupt dolt was Biden.

1 Like
92

Yes, there’s another witch hunt going on that will net the same result as there is no criminal activity.

So ANSWER the question rather than dodge it.

93

Let me put it another way, show me the PROOF that Schiffty eluded to over and over… It doesn’t exist.

94

You are right… it is ok to intimidate witnesses. Silly me

95

Oh gosh :rofl:. There is a literal check. Like it exists.

INVESTIGATE BIDEN. You think I care? What Biden did or didn’t do does not make Trump less crimy

1 Like
96

There was no intimidation.

97

See this is where you are wrong. He didn’t ask the government to investigate. He had his personal lawyer do it. His lawyer who stated on national television that he was working on behalf of the President.

98

What Trump did was abuse of power.

He just wanted a Biden scandal that he could talk about at rallies. That is why he wanted Ukraine to publicly open an investigation.

It is all so transparent.

99

There is a completely legal and non impeachy way to open an investigation on a US citizen.

Trump didn’t do that.

100

Show the proof that he paid her with “campaign funds”.

The entire Ukraine debacle was based off of Trump asking corruption to be investigated. There is no question that Biden admitted to it so it’s Trump’s JOB to ask for an investigation into corruption when determining whether or not to release aid.

1 Like
101

Completely false. All he has to do is play the video where Biden admits to it.