Grand Jury material temporary blocked by Supreme court

[Jezcoe]

@anon91495210

Let me put it to you this way. What crime was he charged with?

You want real obstruction of justice? Hillary was being investigated for having TS information on a personal server, which is a crime. She destroyed thousands of emails and devices, preventing prosecution. Say I’m accused of fraud and I take a hammer to my hard drive, what happens to me?

“But her emails”

It’s like classic rock. But the crappy classic rock like Journey. We all know it and it is comforting but ultimately valid and best left in the past.

It is super lame.

[anon91495210]

Sorry, the truth is just the truth. I would have done time when I had my SCI TS Clearance if I did what Hillary did. It’s not a joke to me.

[Jezcoe]

@anon91495210

Sorry, the truth is just the truth. I would have done time when I had my SCI TS Clearance if I did what Hillary did. It’s not a joke to me.

The argument that because one thinks that Clinton got off means that what the President did is A -OK rings really really hollow.

Disconnect the two.

[Jezcoe]

@anon91495210

Show me where Trump did that… or better yet… show me where Trump was charged with a crime that he was trying to get out of …BIG DAMN DIFFERENCE.

Sorry… not his dad… his father in law.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1069613383622803456

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1069614615510859776

Totally normal and totally okay for someone to do while there is an ongoing investigation.

I mean if a mobster did this… it would be totally cool.

It has been gone over and over why the President hasn’t been charged with crime.

I don’t think that anyone would have ever thought it would be a catch-22 where people would then think that people would construe that no crime was committed.

[conan]

What did the president do again? You libs spent 3 years here saying Trump colluded with Russians which turned out false.

And now libs want to be taken serious?

Sorry pal…doesn’t work that way.

[PurpnGold]

@conan

What did the president do again? You libs spent 3 years here saying Trump colluded with Russians which turned out false.

His campaign did a lot of collusion. Just no conspiracy. Groundhogs day.

@conan

And now libs want to be taken serious?

As serious as “lock her up” cons? . Only difference? We actually have an investigation

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

His campaign did a lot of collusion

No, it didn’t.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

No, it didn’t.

I’m convinced now, thank you

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

No, it didn’t.

I’m convinced now, thank you

You think I’m trying to convince you? That’s cute.

I’m just mucking out stalls.

[conan]

@PurpnGold

His campaign did a lot of collusion. Just no conspiracy. Groundhogs day.

No matter how many times you tell yourself that it’s still won’t be true.

[PurpnGold]

@conan

No matter how many times you tell yourself that it’s still won’t be true.

Roger Stone and the hacker
Manafort and the polling data

None of that was collusion?

[conan]

Like I said…keep telling yourself that.

[PurpnGold]

@conan

Like I said…keep telling yourself that.

That’s not an answer

Was Roger Stone working with the hacker who had stolen materials, collusion?

Was Manafort giving internal polling data to Russians, collusion?

Not talking about criminal conspiracy. Just collusion

[Smyrna]

@Snow96

And this right here shows they don’t know an impeachable offense was committed, but they are trying to find one. That’s NOT how investigations are supposed to happen.

Rosenstein added additional scope for Mueller to investigate Trump way outside of Russian collusion with the sole intent of finding anything possible to remove Trump, knowing full well the Russian collusion portion of the allegation was a hoax. This is what Barr and Durham are partially investigating right now and as Barr stated, it’s evolved into a criminal investigation.

[Piper]

@Jezcoe

In almost any other time in American History, the stuff that was in the Mueller Report would have ended that President.

I for the life of me can’t understand why people defend the indefensible.

Mueller thought that as well, so don’t feel bad. His team told him there was evidence enough for congress to convict Trump in the report. They lied.

Mueller himself didn’t have any idea what was in it.

[SpacemanSpiff]

@Camp

Not as bad as obstructing a CV19 response.

pasty face pelosi needs more ice cream.

Y’know, the whole ice cream thing falls flat when it’s being harped on by people who worship a guy that literally has a gold plated toilet. Ice cream ain’t expensive, and the ice cream freezer at my grocery store is about 90% full.

[zantax]

@NebraskaFootball

@Jezcoe

@NebraskaFootball

@Jezcoe

There were several instances of obstruction of justice.

That used to be considered a bad thing.

Indeed. Provable with mountains of evidentiary information that confirms all three pillars for an obstruction case. Literally any other person in this country would have been indicted and convicted for such obvious crimes. Other than the President. That one office alone is all that kept Trump from proper punishment for his running afoul of the law.

No different than his multiple felonies committed in the weeks prior to the 2016 election. The reason Individual 1 is an unindicted co-conspirator and not a felon is because of the office he occupies.

But none of that matters to some. Some will even pretend these factual realities don’t exist. For some weird reason some have opted to live in an alternate reality in order to be comfortable with Donald Trump as the leader of conservatives, Republicans, and the entire right-wing of America.

It is bonkers that because there is legal opinion that the President can’t be indicted until after the remedy of impeachment that that gets translated into the President not doing anything wrong and in some instances can’t even be investigated.

It is super crazy.

Indeed. I’m not even sure crazy or bonkers are the right adjectives. It’s the very antithesis to what our system was built upon. That no man…NONE…are above the law. We have witnessed a full bastardization of the concept of rule of law and holding all men equally accountable. And for Donald Trump of all people.

I am pretty sure the constitution has been in place the entire time the country has. And yes, that means you can’t remove a President from office by criminal conviction and it has been that way since this countries inception. It’s not something new, just for Trump.

[anon91495210]

No. Incorrect. That is NOT my argument. My argument is that Hillary broke the law. Trump didn’t.

[anon91495210]

Wow. That’s seriously obstruction to you? Sounds more like the truth again. Exactly WHAT crime was Trump trying to get out of?

[PurpnGold]

@anon91495210

Wow. That’s seriously obstruction to you? Sounds more like the truth again. Exactly WHAT crime was Trump trying to get out of?

No that wonderful tweet is considered witness intimidation.