Good News!The Clinton Email scandal is over

You must be really upset about the Trump administration ignoring subpoenas then.

1 Like

Where do alternate facts fit in?

1 Like

Wait. You think Durham is looking into the emails?

:rofl:

2 Likes

Is this your admission that you have no idea how subpoenas work?

1 Like

Thirty eight people committed 91 crimes but will not be charged? However, other government employees who break these same information protocols end up charged and imprisoned. I thought the process included indicting the smaller fish to flip them out of protecting the big fish into testifying about the actual skullduggery of the big fish. But not in this case.

There are two words I never thought Iā€™d see joined together ā€“ Trump and intellectual.

1 Like

Give us some examples of other government employees who were charged for similar offenses?

Hillary was never a defendant.

Do you really think people donā€™t just turn over what they are asked to turn over? Why turn over material that is not being requested? :roll_eyes:

This is how things work Smyrna.

3 Likes

Web results
Ex-officials prosecuted for mishandling govā€™t info see ā€˜double standardā€™ in ā€¦

Is this the article you tried to link?

Crimes?

Yes, it is.

As @Jezcoe mentioned, deprogramming is hard.

4 Likes

Which case would you like to discuss how they knowingly violated the law versus what happened in every case here?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798&ved=2ahUKEwjD5Mrn9a_lAhXH_XMBHT4vAlMQFjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw0ZCPGzL9xyGmvWPX_Zznqh&cshid=1571749273187
" U.S. Code Ā§ 798.Disclosure of classified information

prev | next

(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified informationā€”

(1)

concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or

(2)

concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or

(3)

concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or

(4)

obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processesā€”

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States

https://twitter.com/JeffreyToobin/status/1186265613154607106?s=20

2 Likes

You do realize that the words, ā€œintellectualā€ and ā€œineffectualā€ are not one and the same? Go back and reread it except this timeā€¦read what it actually says and not what you wanted it to say.

Congress should take him to court and prosecute himā€¦and expose all that they haveā€¦for all of us to see and guess what youā€™ll seeā€¦another Russia collusion nothing burger that you chewed on and swallowed for 2 years. You now have NO credibility my dear. :sunglasses:

Congress does not prosecute people. Holy smokes man. :man_facepalming:

Irony is ironical.

4 Likes